Group 12: Audit Report
30 original test MCQs. 2 marks each. Separate practice and test sets.
Original practice, not ICAI questions, official suggested answers or an official examiner scheme. Equivalent correct work is credited within the stated caps. Public practice availability is not full official question-bank completion.
Not scored yet.
AUD-G12-T001 · 2 marksA framework permits an accounting policy, but the entity application is inconsistent and required material-event disclosures are inadequate. What must the auditor evaluate?
Explanation
Correct answer B: Actual policy application and disclosures under the applicable framework, not permission alone.
SA 700 paragraphs 12-15 require qualitative, policy and disclosure evaluation; permission alone does not establish proper application.
AUD-G12-T002 · 2 marksA compliance-framework engagement draft uses fair-presentation wording without assessing the actual framework. What is best?
Explanation
Correct answer C: Use the opinion formulation appropriate to the actual framework.
SA 700 paragraphs 25-27 distinguish fair-presentation and compliance wording with applicable framework reference.
AUD-G12-T003 · 2 marksManagement estimates individually appear small, but uncorrected errors aggregate materially. What is right?
Explanation
Correct answer B: Consider aggregate materiality in forming the opinion, not each item only in isolation.
SA 700 paragraph 11(b) incorporates individual or aggregate materiality of uncorrected misstatements; evidence and other evaluations also matter.
AUD-G12-T004 · 2 marksThe Basis for Opinion says the audit followed SAs but omits the required independence/ethical responsibilities statement. Which correction applies?
Explanation
Correct answer D: Include the required ethics/independence statement referring to ICAI Code of Ethics.
SA 700 paragraph 28(c) specifies this basis statement; it does not determine the opinion type alone.
AUD-G12-T005 · 2 marksA material disclosure omission is fundamental to users understanding and evidence is sufficient. What opinion branch applies when judged pervasive?
Explanation
Correct answer B: Adverse opinion.
SA 705 paragraphs 5(a)(iii)/8 address fundamental disclosure pervasiveness and known material pervasive misstatement.
AUD-G12-T006 · 2 marksSufficient evidence identifies material non-pervasive overstatement. The draft says except for possible effects. What is right?
Explanation
Correct answer C: Use except for the effects for the known-misstatement qualification.
SA 705 paragraph 17 reserves possible-effects wording for evidence inability; the supplied known branch is effects.
AUD-G12-T007 · 2 marksAfter a management-imposed post-acceptance limitation, alternatives fail and possible effects are material/pervasive. Withdrawal is not practicable or legally possible before report. What is required?
Explanation
Correct answer A: Disclaim the opinion under the specified branch.
SA 705 paragraph 13(b)(ii) governs this supplied impossibility; paragraph 13(b)(i) withdrawal is conditional.
AUD-G12-T008 · 2 marksThe auditor gives an adverse opinion on statements as a whole, then adds an unmodified opinion on one account under the same framework in that same report. What is correct?
Explanation
Correct answer D: Do not include that contradictory unmodified opinion in the same report.
SA 705 paragraph 15 prohibits the contradiction in the same report; it distinguishes a separately engaged element audit.
AUD-G12-T009 · 2 marksA disclaimer report has a KAM section despite no law/regulation requiring it. What is needed?
Explanation
Correct answer A: Remove the KAM section under the applicable disclaimer restriction.
SA 705 paragraph 29/SA 701 paragraph 5 prohibit this section absent the legal requirement; report sections do not redefine the opinion.
AUD-G12-T010 · 2 marksFor a non-listed complete general-purpose audit, law requires KAM reporting. Can the team reject SA 701 solely because not listed?
Explanation
Correct answer D: No; SA 701 also applies when KAM reporting is required by law/regulation.
SA 701 paragraph 5 extends scope to legal requirements and otherwise-decided communication; selection requirements still apply.
AUD-G12-T011 · 2 marksA high-uncertainty estimate required significant auditor judgment but was not of most significance after supported assessment. What is right?
Explanation
Correct answer D: It is not automatically a KAM solely from high uncertainty; apply the most-significance selection judgment.
SA 701 paragraphs 9-10 use significant attention factors and narrowing most-significance assessment.
AUD-G12-T012 · 2 marksAn actual applicable law precludes public disclosure of a determined KAM. What exception may apply?
Explanation
Correct answer A: The law/regulation preclusion branch, with supported rationale and applicable communication/documentation.
SA 701 paragraph 14(a) differs from the rare adverse-consequences branch; paragraph 18(c) documents actual omission rationale.
AUD-G12-T013 · 2 marksSA 701 applies and there are no KAMs to communicate on supported facts, with no disclaimer branch. What is required?
Explanation
Correct answer D: A statement to that effect in a separate Key Audit Matters section.
SA 701 paragraph 16 specifies the statement in this circumstance; paragraph 18 records the supported determination.
AUD-G12-T014 · 2 marksAppropriate-basis material going-concern uncertainty is adequately disclosed and requires the specified separate section. How does KAM interaction work when SA 701 applies?
Explanation
Correct answer A: Report under SA 570 and reference the MURGC section rather than ordinary duplicate KAM description.
SA 701 paragraph 15 governs by-nature interaction; KAM is not substitute for the required SA 570 section.
AUD-G12-T015 · 2 marksAn EOM draft includes new facts not presented/disclosed in statements. What is right?
Explanation
Correct answer A: EOM refers only to presented/disclosed information with a clear relevant disclosure reference.
SA 706 paragraph 9(b) defines the content boundary; assess any actual disclosure/report issue separately.
AUD-G12-T016 · 2 marksManagement wants EOM instead of the required Material Uncertainty Related to Going Concern section. What is correct?
Explanation
Correct answer B: EOM is not a substitute for the specified SA 570 reporting.
SA 706 A 7(c) expressly preserves going-concern reporting requirements.
AUD-G12-T017 · 2 marksA relevant outside-statements matter would merit OM, but applicable law prohibits its communication. What is right?
Explanation
Correct answer A: The OM condition is not met; respect the actual legal prohibition.
SA 706 paragraph 10(a) makes lawful communication a condition; changing headings is not a bypass.
AUD-G12-T018 · 2 marksThe auditor expects EOM or OM but says governance need not hear its wording. Which duty applies?
Explanation
Correct answer D: Communicate the expectation and wording to governance.
SA 706 paragraph 12 specifically requires expectation and wording communication, not an opinion transfer.
AUD-G12-T019 · 2 marksIn comparative statements, the auditor own current opinion on a prior period differs from the former opinion. What report communication is required?
Explanation
Correct answer D: Substantive reasons for the different opinion in an Other Matter paragraph.
SA 710 paragraph 16 covers this own-prior-opinion situation with OM reasons, not automatic immutability.
AUD-G12-T020 · 2 marksEvidence confirms a material prior misstatement formerly reported unmodified, not dealt with as the framework requires, in corresponding figures. What follows?
Explanation
Correct answer C: Qualified or adverse as appropriate with respect to corresponding figures.
SA 710 paragraph 12 specifies the response; precise type depends on appropriate actual reporting assessment.
AUD-G12-T021 · 2 marksComparative prior statements were predecessor-audited and the predecessor report is revised with the statements. Which qualifier matters?
Explanation
Correct answer C: Paragraph 17 predecessor-OM information has its stated revised-report exception.
SA 710 paragraph 17 states this exception; report scope and actual revised information must be evaluated.
AUD-G12-T022 · 2 marksPrior comparative financial statements were unaudited. The team discloses that fact and cancels opening-balance work. What is right?
Explanation
Correct answer A: The unaudited OM statement does not relieve required opening-balance evidence work.
SA 710 paragraph 19 preserves the evidence requirement just as paragraph 14 does for corresponding figures.
AUD-G12-T023 · 2 marksSeveral components are individually immaterial but together material to entity information. Can SA 600 procedures be ignored solely from individual sizes?
Explanation
Correct answer D: No; the procedures should be considered for the material aggregate.
India SA 600 paragraph 4 expressly distinguishes individual and combined materiality.
AUD-G12-T024 · 2 marksThe other auditor is not an ICAI member. What specific acceptance/use consideration applies?
Explanation
Correct answer B: Consider professional competence in the context of the specific assignment.
India SA 600 paragraph 11 specifies the conditional competence consideration; non-membership alone is not a conclusion.
AUD-G12-T025 · 2 marksOther-auditor work cannot be used and sufficient additional procedures on component information were not possible. What reporting response does India SA 600 specify?
Explanation
Correct answer B: Qualified opinion or disclaimer for the scope limitation, as appropriate to assessed implications.
India SA 600 paragraph 22 addresses unusable work plus insufficient additional procedures; apply relevant materiality/pervasiveness reporting considerations.
AUD-G12-T026 · 2 marksFacts should arouse suspicion about other-auditor work reliability. Can responsibility division be invoked as unconditional protection?
Explanation
Correct answer C: No; paragraph 24 expressly has that suspicion exception.
India SA 600 paragraph 24 retains this boundary alongside principal procedures; it is not automatic fraud proof.
AUD-G12-T027 · 2 marksWork allocation is agreed orally but remains unsigned and uncommunicated to governance. What is missing?
Explanation
Correct answer C: All joint auditors sign the allocation document and communicate it to governance.
SA 299 paragraph 12 specifies signed allocation and governance communication; preparation is not delivery.
AUD-G12-T028 · 2 marksCommon-area procedure decisions were agreed, but one joint auditor executes them improperly in the allotted work. Which distinction matters?
Explanation
Correct answer C: Shared appropriateness of agreed decisions versus individual proper execution responsibility.
SA 299 paragraphs 13-14/A 4 distinguish these responsibilities; actual execution remains the concerned auditor duty.
AUD-G12-T029 · 2 marksNo contrary matter is known. Must a joint auditor retest all other joint auditor work solely to establish it was done under SAs?
Explanation
Correct answer C: No; the specified entitlement to assume other work does not require that routine cross-review/retesting.
SA 299 paragraph 18 states the entitlement; paragraph 15 coordination and known relevant matters still require their proper treatment.
AUD-G12-T030 · 2 marksJoint auditors finalise reports without discussing respective conclusions, expecting a modification and OM reference. What must happen?
Explanation
Correct answer B: Discuss conclusions and communicate required modification/matter expectation wording to governance.
SA 299 paragraphs 20-21 require discussion and applicable governance communication; references do not cure opinion issues.
Official concept links appear with each question. These use current official Indian standard texts, not assumed international replacements.