Group 14: Bank Audit

30 original descriptive cases. Descriptive mix: 5 at 3 marks, 19 at 5 marks, 6 at 10 marks.

Original practice, not ICAI questions, official suggested answers or an official examiner scheme. Equivalent correct work is credited within the stated caps. Public practice availability is not full official question-bank completion.

Do not treat the module software stress-test definition as banking-risk stress testing, prior-auditor communication as automatically an NOC requirement, or its illustrative large-advance example as a universal statutory threshold.

AUD-G14-D001 · 3 marks

A new payments channel, an old audit plan A branch adds a high-volume digital-payment channel. Prior inspection noted reconciliation delays, but the team copies last-year procedures without reviewing the channel or delays. Required: Explain three bank-specific planning corrections. (3 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditCase application / answer
1Understand changed nature and level of branch operations.The new channel changes the transaction flow and possible risks; last-year scope is not evidence of current suitability.
1Review adverse features and previous-report compliance.The unresolved reconciliation delays need a current status/effect assessment, not deletion from the planning file.
1Base the plan on assessed control breaches and audit risks.Use channel familiarisation and reconciliation evidence to decide responsive procedures rather than copy testing unchanged.

Non-credit errors

  • No assumption that channel volume alone proves fraud or a specified opinion.
Official concept source: ICAI Bank Audit module references Audit plan and control environment

AUD-G14-D002 · 5 marks

The trader approves their own settlement At a bank desk, the same person originates trades, approves settlement, records positions and clears reconciliation exceptions. Management says system timestamps make segregation unnecessary. Required: Explain five control/evidence considerations. (5 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditCase application / answer
1Assess front/back-office segregation.Origination and settlement control by one person creates a supplied conflict; a timestamp does not separate responsibility.
1Check independent transaction verification/approval.Seek evidence of authorised approval distinct from the originating person, not merely their own system entry.
1Check accurate measurement/reporting of positions.Self-recorded positions need supported accuracy checks and appropriate audit response.
1Check independent reconciliation of positions and results.Self-cleared exceptions undermine independent challenge; inspect actual reconciliations and supporting resolutions.
1Check limits, exception reporting/approval and consequences for audit work.Determine whether overrides were authorised and monitored; weaker controls require responsive evidence, not automatic total reliance or a guessed opinion.

Non-credit errors

  • A timestamp proves neither independence nor appropriate approval.
Official concept source: ICAI Bank Audit module references Control environment

AUD-G14-D003 · 5 marks

The control exists only in a policy manual A daily bank reconciliation control is described in a manual. The named employee left, no replacement is identified, logs are missing, and the manager says the policy title is sufficient evidence of performance. Required: Apply five control-understanding questions to the evidence gaps. (5 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditCase application / answer
1Identify who performs it and their knowledge/authority.Departure makes the actual performer unknown; establish replacement and competence.
1Identify what demonstrates performance.The manual describes design, not proof that daily reconciliations were performed.
1Establish when/frequency and whether sufficient for the risk.A daily label does not prove daily operation; inspect actual dates and missed periods.
1Establish where evidence is retained and accessible.Missing logs require investigating retention/access and obtaining alternative supported evidence where possible.
1Understand how bypasses and exceptions are detected/resolved.Ask about overrides, unresolved exceptions and resolution timing; do not invent effective operation from policy alone.

Non-credit errors

  • No operating-effectiveness conclusion from a manual alone.
Official concept source: ICAI Bank Audit module references Control questions:who/what/when/where/how

AUD-G14-D004 · 5 marks

One new branch and several reports The team finds a prior-year adverse advance comment, a recent internal inspection warning, an RBI inspection provisioning variation and a security-verification defect. Management says only the annual statutory report matters and that prior findings become irrelevant once a new manager takes charge. Required: Explain five review actions. (5 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditCase application / answer
1Review prior audit comments on advances and their current resolution.The adverse comment is a lead to follow, not proof that the new manager cured it.
1Review internal inspection/concurrent/internal reports.The current internal warning informs risk and procedures; do not ignore it because it is not statutory.
1Review the RBI inspection and management treatment of provisioning variations.Check supported consideration and correction, not a verbal assertion that the regulator report is old.
1Review security-verification reports and relevant account-specific evidence.The defect may affect security/evidence/provisioning judgments and needs investigation.
1Use findings to revise audit work and retain independent judgment.A manager change/report existence is not a cure; corroborate resolution and decide responsive procedures rather than copy another report as audit proof.

Non-credit errors

  • No blind reliance or assumption that management change erases defects.
Official concept source: ICAI Bank Audit module references Reliance on/review of other reports

AUD-G14-D005 · 10 marks

Bank risk governance with an unusable dashboard A bank expands into a new lending product. Its risk policy predates the product, risk limits are approved only verbally, the front office changes model assumptions without independent review, and the dashboard arrives late with inconsistent exposure totals. Management says the dashboard colour remains green, so the statutory auditor can rely on all controls. Required: Prepare a risk-process review and responsive audit plan grounded in these facts. (10 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditCase application / answer
1Check governance approval of written risk policies.The stale policy and verbal limits require evidence of appropriate approved policies, not a green dashboard substitute.
1Assess consistency with business objectives and strategy.The new product must be considered in the policy/risk-process scope rather than assumed covered.
1Assess consistency with capital strength, expertise and regulatory requirements.The file needs relevant support; product approval alone does not establish these constraints were evaluated.
1Identify significant product risks.Understand the new lending process and exposures that could affect statements; do not infer risk absence from colour.
1Check measurement/monitoring against pre-approved limits and criteria.Verbal limits and inconsistent totals do not demonstrate reliable limit monitoring.
1Assess segregation and transaction/control approvals.Front-office assumption changes require appropriate challenge and approval controls.
1Assess independent monitoring/updating of models, methods and assumptions.Unreviewed changes create a supplied monitoring weakness; inspect governance and independent risk-unit work.
1Assess information-system reliability and timeliness.Late inconsistent exposure totals need reconciliation and data-quality investigation.
1Assess whether reporting enables governance to understand changing risk.The green indicator is unpersuasive if the underlying totals/policy are defective.
1Design responsive audit evidence rather than blanket control reliance.Use supported risk/control conclusions to select nature/timing/extent of further work; do not assume an automatic fraud finding or opinion type.

Non-credit errors

  • No dashboard-colour assurance or unverified capital-ratio arithmetic.
Official concept source: ICAI Bank Audit module references Risk management process and reliable information systems

AUD-G14-D006 · 3 marks

Outsourced reconciliation is not outsourced responsibility A bank outsources a reconciliation process. The team removes the process from its risk assessment because the vendor advertises specialist staff. Required: Explain three audit implications. (3 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditCase application / answer
1Include outsourced activity in understanding the bank process and risks.Vendor expertise claims do not prove the outsourced transaction/data flow is low risk.
1Assess relevant bank/vendor controls and available performance evidence.Investigate how reconciliations, exceptions and oversight operate rather than assume outsourcing cures them.
1Plan further procedures responsive to identified risks.Determine needed evidence and implications of access limitations; do not treat exclusion from testing as justified by outsourcing alone.

Non-credit errors

  • Outsourcing is not an automatic removal of audit-evidence needs.
Official concept source: ICAI Bank Audit module references Outsourcing risks and responses to assessed risks

AUD-G14-D007 · 5 marks

Problem advances outside a random sample The branch sample omits an account repeatedly criticised by internal inspection and includes only routine low-risk balances. Management argues that random selection forbids adding a problem account. No universal large-advance threshold is supplied. Required: Explain five selection/evidence corrections. (5 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditCase application / answer
1Identify problem accounts from relevant reports and current facts.The repeatedly criticised account is a risk lead that the team must assess.
1Consider detailed examination of problem accounts unless insignificant.Routine random selection does not automatically justify omitting this account.
1Determine large-advance selection in branch context.Assess volume and risk rather than invent a universal rupee rule from a module example.
1Relate sampling extent to assessed control efficacy and other risks.Selection is not complete merely because a random function ran; address the supplied coverage bias.
1Document coverage and responsive procedures with independent conclusions.Add risk-directed work as appropriate and evaluate evidence; selection does not itself establish the account is misstated or fraudulent.

Non-credit errors

  • No universal statutory threshold from an illustrative module amount.
Official concept source: ICAI Bank Audit module references Advances substantive procedures/large and problem accounts

AUD-G14-D008 · 5 marks

A guarantee is not an ordinary funded loan A bank has an undrawn guarantee and an undrawn letter of credit, plus a term loan already disbursed. The draft lists all three as transferred loan funds and omits further review of contingent exposures. Assume no guarantee or credit has devolved/invoked on supplied facts. Required: Distinguish facilities and plan evidence. (5 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditCase application / answer
1Identify funded lending by actual transfer of funds.The supplied disbursed term loan is a funded advance.
1Identify guarantee and letter of credit as non-funded facilities on these facts.The supplied undrawn/non-devolved exposures do not become actual transferred funds merely because limits exist.
1Review terms, authorisation and exposure records for non-funded facilities.Do not omit their risk/recording/disclosure review because no current cash transfer occurred.
1Check invocation/devolvement or other status changes from evidence.The question assumes none; actual audit work must confirm relevant status rather than invent funding.
1Assess appropriate accounting/disclosures and risks separately.Correct the all-funded label without claiming non-funded exposures have no credit risk or necessarily require the same balance presentation.

Non-credit errors

  • No transfer-of-funds fiction or zero-risk claim for non-funded facilities.
Official concept source: ICAI Bank Audit module references Funded and non-funded facilities

AUD-G14-D009 · 5 marks

A risk meeting without the specialists A branch uses complex interfaces. The engagement partner excludes the contracted specialist from planning discussions, does not discuss prior errors or possible staff manipulation, and keeps no record of the discussion. Management offers an assurance that all interfaces are safe. Required: Explain five planning-discussion corrections. (5 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditCase application / answer
1Include relevant engagement personnel/specialists in discussion.The contracted specialist performing engagement work is not excluded merely because they are not permanent staff.
1Discuss susceptibility of branch statements to material misstatement.Management assurance cannot replace understanding interface-related risks.
1Discuss likely and prior-year errors.The omitted prior issues are planning leads that need current evaluation.
1Discuss possible fraud methods and appropriate responses while keeping skepticism.Possible staff manipulation must be considered without asserting fraud has occurred.
1Document discussions and resulting planning decisions.No record leaves the risk/response reasoning unsupported; do not use a broad management safety statement as the audit conclusion.

Non-credit errors

  • No unsupported interface-safety guarantee or automatic fraud finding.
Official concept source: ICAI Bank Audit module references Engagement team discussions

AUD-G14-D010 · 10 marks

A branch planning memorandum that says only "repeat last year" The branch has changed its loan-processing system, unresolved previous-report exceptions and a higher volume of cross-branch transactions. The draft memorandum says repeat last-year tests, rely on every control and choose materiality only from last-year fees. Key team members have not been involved and the opening-balance evidence for this initial engagement is not yet planned. Required: Set out a bank-specific planning/completion framework with justified evidence decisions. (10 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditCase application / answer
1Understand the bank/branch and changed accounting process.The system change and cross-branch flows alter risk identification and evidence needs.
1Identify financial-statement-level risks.Consider broader effects of processing/reconciliation weaknesses across branch reporting, not only one balance.
1Identify relevant assertion-level risks for classes/balances/disclosures.Use actual flows and unresolved exceptions to select responsive further procedures.
1Establish overall strategy with key team members and appropriate specialists.A partner-only copied memorandum does not capture relevant system expertise and current scope.
1Describe expected scope and extent of procedures.The memorandum needs an actual plan for the changed bank processes, not a repeat-last-year label.
1Highlight significant issues/risks and control-reliance decisions.All-controls reliance is unsupported until relevant control operation/evidence is assessed.
1Link nature/timing/extent of further procedures to assessed risks.Specify responsive work for system changes, cross-branch records and previous exceptions.
1Determine materiality using professional judgment and bank/reporting context.Prior fees alone are not the relevant knowledge/risk/reporting basis; no universal percent is invented.
1Plan opening-balance evidence for the initial engagement.The missing plan needs SA 510-informed work; appointment does not prove opening figures, and any reporting effect requires actual supported conclusions.
1Document and update planning as evidence changes.Record supported responses to engagement/pervasive/specific risks rather than treating the initial memorandum as permanent assurance.

Non-credit errors

  • No fees-only materiality or automatic opinion chosen before opening evidence.
Official concept source: ICAI Bank Audit module references Strategy/audit plan/planning memorandum/materiality;initial engagementpage16

AUD-G14-D011 · 5 marks

Three overdue labels, three different tests For three unrelated borrowers, a term loan is overdue exactly 90 days, a purchased bill 91 days, and a CC account has remained below limit/DP with no credits for 90 continuous days. Management uses one rule, "only more than 90 days matters", for all three. Assume the bank is within paragraph 3 of the current RBI commercial-bank Directions, not an excluded bank class; no restructuring or other special exception applies unless stated. Required: Apply the distinct triggers without a blanket all-standard conclusion. (5 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditCase application / answer
1Apply the term-loan more-than 90 day trigger.Exactly 90 days does not satisfy 42(1) on this fact alone; do not assert all other possible triggers absent beyond the case assumptions.
1Apply the purchased-bill trigger.The 91 day overdue exceeds 90 days and satisfies 42(4).
1Apply the CC out-of-order definition.No credits continuously for 90 days satisfies 5(7)(ii) despite balance below limit/DP.
1Connect out-of-order CC to NPA classification.Paragraph 42(2) makes that supplied CC status an NPA trigger.
1Verify overdue/credit dates and scope separately.Do not import a strictly-more-than 90 day term-loan test into every CC criterion or infer opinion type from classification alone.

Non-credit errors

  • No invented recovery, exemption or automatic overall opinion.
Official concept source: RBI commercial-bank IRACP updated October1,2026 references 5(7),42(1),(2),(4)

AUD-G14-D012 · 5 marks

Credits arrive, but do not cover interest A CC balance is below limit/DP. Credits during the previous 90 day period total Rs 18,000; interest debited in the same period is Rs 24,000. Management calls it regular because credits exist. Assume the bank is within paragraph 3 of the current RBI commercial-bank Directions, not an excluded bank class; no restructuring or other special exception applies unless stated. Required: Apply the interest-coverage criterion and audit evidence. (5 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditCase application / answer
1Use the credits-versus-interest out-of-order criterion.Paragraph 5(7)(iii) is separate from no-credits and excess-limit tests.
1Compare the supplied same-period totals.Rs 18,000 is below Rs 24,000, a Rs 6,000 shortfall.
1Apply the previous 90 day period including the day-end processing date.The comparison is not an arbitrary annual average or a later window selected to pass.
1Conclude out-of-order and NPA on the supplied criterion.Paragraph 42(2) applies; some credits do not cure insufficient interest coverage.
1Inspect dates, credits and debits from records.Confirm comparable period, genuine credits and actual interest; no presumed cash recovery or automatic adverse opinion.

Non-credit errors

  • No invented recovery, exemption or automatic overall opinion.
Official concept source: RBI commercial-bank IRACP updated October1,2026 references 5(7)(iii)andExplanation 1;42(2)

AUD-G14-D013 · 3 marks

A wealthy guarantor does not make arrears disappear An ordinary term loan is overdue 120 days. A wealthy guarantor offers a comfort letter and the bank calls the loan standard on that ground alone. Assume the bank is within paragraph 3 of the current RBI commercial-bank Directions, not an excluded bank class; no restructuring or other special exception applies unless stated. Required: Apply recovery, security and classification. (3 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditCase application / answer
1Use the actual recovery record for classification.The supplied 120 day overdue satisfies the ordinary term-loan NPA criterion.
1Do not use guarantor wealth/security alone as a classification cure.Paragraph 46 excludes that substitution subject to its specific exception; no such exception is supplied.
1Separate classification from security/provision assessment.Evaluate actual enforceability/value and relevant provisioning independently; the letter is not receipt of overdue cash.

Non-credit errors

  • No invented recovery, exemption or automatic overall opinion.
Official concept source: RBI commercial-bank IRACP updated October1,2026 references 42(1),45-46

AUD-G14-D014 · 5 marks

One borrower, a hidden devolved guarantee An ordinary borrower has an NPA term loan and a regularly serviced second funded facility. An invoked guarantee amount is parked in a suspense-like separate account. Management proposes classifying only the term loan. No LC-bill or PACS/FSS exception applies. Assume the bank is within paragraph 3 of the current RBI commercial-bank Directions, not an excluded bank class; no restructuring or other special exception applies unless stated. Required: Apply borrower-wise treatment and account completeness. (5 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditCase application / answer
1Apply borrower-wise rather than facility-only classification.Paragraph 44 does not preserve the second ordinary facility as standard merely because it is serviced.
1Include relevant borrower-issued securities/investments in the rule scope.The rule covers facilities and securities issued by the borrower, not every unrelated investment.
1Include the invoked-guarantee separate balance as part of principal operating account.Paragraph 35 prevents parking it outside the borrower assessment.
1Reconcile exposure records and separate-account transactions.Identify omitted balances and verify invocation/devolvement details rather than accepting the standard label.
1Apply supported classification and other reporting effects separately.No supplied exception applies; still assess accounting/provisioning/evidence without a mechanical whole-statement opinion.

Non-credit errors

  • No invented recovery, exemption or automatic overall opinion.
Official concept source: RBI commercial-bank IRACP updated October1,2026 references 35,44

AUD-G14-D015 · 10 marks

A closing credit and the reversed cure A weak borrower account receives a solitary large credit just before year-end; it is reversed shortly after closing. The same file has a four-month-old stock statement used for DP, irregular drawings continuing 90 days and a manager-only system override with no audit trail. Management says the single credit and manual standard label settle classification. Assume the bank is within paragraph 3 of the current RBI commercial-bank Directions, not an excluded bank class; no restructuring or other special exception applies unless stated. Required: Review classification, stock age and override evidence without treating a temporary deficiency alone as sufficient for every NPA decision. (10 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditCase application / answer
1Handle solitary/few closing credits with care.Paragraph 47 prevents automatic acceptance of the apparent cure.
1Assess underlying account weakness from available data.Paragraph 48 requires NPA treatment where inherent weakness is indicated; evaluate actual evidence.
1Inspect transactions immediately before and after closing.The subsequent reversal challenges genuineness/effect of regularisation and needs traced evidence.
1Require satisfactory evidence for genuine regularisation.Paragraph 49 is not satisfied by a manager statement or isolated credit alone.
1Check DP from current stock statements.Paragraph 15 requires current security information; four-month-old input breaches the stated no-older-than-three-month guideline.
1Assess the continuous irregular-drawing fact.The supplied 90 days satisfies 42(3); borrower wealth does not cure it.
1Distinguish temporary deficiencies from established triggers.Paragraph 45 does not make every brief stock/limit defect automatically NPA; these supplied sustained facts are different.
1Reject an override as an exemption from prudential norms.Paragraph 38 permits exceptional automation treatment, not waiver of income/classification/provision norms.
1Check required two-level authorisation, policy documentation and audit trail.The manager-only undocumented override fails the supplied control safeguards.
1Resolve classification/evidence and reporting implications.A system label alone is not proof; retain supported reasoning and consider necessary accounting/reporting effects separately.

Non-credit errors

  • No invented recovery, exemption or automatic overall opinion.
Official concept source: RBI commercial-bank IRACP updated October1,2026 references 15,38,42(3),45,47-49

AUD-G14-D016 · 5 marks

Crop seasons, not every agricultural label Two loans are verified eligible agricultural facilities under paragraph 57(2). Principal is overdue for two crop seasons on a short-duration crop and one season on a long-duration crop. A separate agricultural-labelled loan is verified outside that paragraph. Management uses a single harvest rule for all three. Assume the bank is within paragraph 3 of the current RBI commercial-bank Directions, not an excluded bank class; no restructuring or other special exception applies unless stated. Required: Explain the applicable distinctions and evidence. (5 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditCase application / answer
1Apply two-season criterion to the eligible short-duration crop loan.The supplied two overdue crop seasons meets 42(6).
1Apply one-season criterion to the eligible long-duration crop loan.The supplied one overdue crop season meets 42(7).
1Use verified eligible facility status, not a broad agriculture label.Paragraph 57(2) defines qualifying facilities; the case supplies that status rather than guessing thresholds.
1Apply non-agricultural identification basis to the outside-category loan.Paragraph 57(3) does not extend crop-season rules to every agricultural-labelled advance.
1Verify due dates and SLBC-determined crop seasons.Do not replace seasons with arbitrary calendar months or assume all three have identical NPA trigger facts.

Non-credit errors

  • No invented recovery, exemption or automatic overall opinion.
Official concept source: RBI commercial-bank IRACP updated October1,2026 references 5(1),(4),(11),42(6)-(7),57(2)-(3)

AUD-G14-D017 · 5 marks

The consortium leader has the cash Borrower remittances reach the consortium lead bank, but another member has not received its share and has no express consent for transfer. Its books show no servicing while management cites the lead-bank recovery as sufficient. Assume the bank is within paragraph 3 of the current RBI commercial-bank Directions, not an excluded bank class; no restructuring or other special exception applies unless stated. Required: Apply the member-bank recovery assessment. (5 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditCase application / answer
1Use individual member recovery and recoverability facts.Paragraph 53(1) does not automatically substitute the leader record for this member.
1Treat retained pooled remittances as not serviced in the other member books.The supplied no-share-transfer situation is covered by 53(2).
1Apply the stated NPA consequence on those facts.The member cannot give a clean performing classification solely from cash retained elsewhere.
1Arrange transfer or express lead-bank consent to transfer the member share.Paragraph 53(3) identifies the specified evidence route; no consent is supplied here.
1Trace allocation, transfers and supported classification.Obtain bank/consortium records, not an invented received amount or assumption that every member is identical.

Non-credit errors

  • No invented recovery, exemption or automatic overall opinion.
Official concept source: RBI commercial-bank IRACP updated October1,2026 references 53

AUD-G14-D018 · 5 marks

A qualifying deposit and a gold ornament One overdue advance is against a term deposit with adequate margin verified. Another is against gold ornaments. Management applies the same exemption to both. Assume the bank is within paragraph 3 of the current RBI commercial-bank Directions, not an excluded bank class; no restructuring or other special exception applies unless stated. Required: Apply paragraph 55 and evidence boundaries. (5 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditCase application / answer
1Identify the specified term-deposit exception.Paragraph 55(1) permits the qualifying advance not to be treated as NPA subject to adequate margin.
1Verify the margin condition rather than presume it.The case supplies adequate margin for the deposit, but audit work must establish actual available security and exposure.
1Do not extend the exception to gold ornaments.Paragraph 55(2) expressly excludes gold/government/other securities from this exception.
1Apply ordinary relevant recovery criteria to the gold advance.Its exact ageing/status must be evaluated; security value alone does not settle classification.
1Keep income recognition and provisioning requirements separate.The classification exception is not a blanket statement that every income/provision rule disappears; verify those requirements before asserting rates.

Non-credit errors

  • No invented recovery, exemption or automatic overall opinion.
Official concept source: RBI commercial-bank IRACP updated October1,2026 references 55

AUD-G14-D019 · 5 marks

DP from paid stock, not gross inventory Under a supplied bank-approved exercise policy, stock is Rs 900 lakh, unpaid stock Rs 300 lakh, stock margin 25 percent; debtors Rs 700 lakh, ineligible debtors Rs 200 lakh, debtor margin 40 percent. Sanctioned CC limit is Rs 800 lakh and outstanding Rs 790 lakh. The assistant says being below sanction is enough. Required: Compute DP and distinguish the irregularity from a time-based NPA conclusion. (5 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditCase application / answer
1Compute eligible paid stock Rs 600 lakh.Rs 900-Rs 300=Rs 600; unpaid stock is excluded under the supplied policy.
1Apply supplied stock margin to get Rs 450 lakh.Rs 600 x 75 percent=Rs 450; no universal margin is claimed.
1Compute eligible debtor DP Rs 300 lakh.(Rs 700-Rs 200)x 60 percent=Rs 300.
1Compute total DP Rs 750 lakh and excess Rs 40 lakh.Rs 450+Rs 300=Rs 750; outstanding Rs 790 exceeds DP by Rs 40 though below sanction Rs 800.
1Report/investigate the irregularity and its duration/evidence.Accounts must meet both limits. One supplied balance alone does not prove a continuous 90 day NPA trigger; obtain current statements/policy and actual duration.

Non-credit errors

  • No invented recovery, exemption or automatic overall opinion.
Official concept source: ICAI Bank Audit module references ModuleDPcalculationandcurrentstockevidence

AUD-G14-D020 · 10 marks

Advance file with evidence gaps A branch ledger shows a large term loan. The file lacks signed loan documents and a clear sanction-condition completion record; a stock audit reports unpaid inventory incorrectly treated as paid. Another advance is absent from the main ledger but appears in disbursement records. Management treats the ledger total and borrower letter as sufficient for existence, rights, completeness and valuation. Required: Give an advances-evidence plan addressing the supplied risks without issuing a predetermined opinion. (10 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditCase application / answer
1Verify amounts outstanding at balance-sheet date.Reconcile ledger, disbursement and borrower/account evidence, not only a total.
1Establish amounts actually due to the bank.Examine supported loan obligations and transactions; a letter alone need not establish every right.
1Check applicable loan/security documents.Missing signed documentation requires investigation and alternative evidence where appropriate, not a fictional completed file.
1Check sanction terms and their compliance.Inspect authorised approval and completion of conditions rather than rely solely on sanction existence.
1Investigate disbursements not in the main ledger.Trace the separate records for completeness and appropriate accounting; do not ignore them because totals already agree.
1Review stock-audit security/DP findings.The unpaid-as-paid defect affects supported drawing power and security assessment.
1Compare relevant borrower statements and audited-account data.Investigate discrepancies and eligible-security values under the actual bank policy.
1Assess valuation/classification/provision requirements from current norms.Recovery/evidence and realisable security need separate assessment; no remembered percentage is substituted.
1Assess relevant controls and determine responsive substantive work.Risk-directed procedures are needed for the large/problem advance and omissions, with documented scope.
1Conclude from obtained evidence and address unresolved limits.Document supported adjustments/reporting implications; missing papers do not automatically prove fraud or require one opinion type in every case.

Non-credit errors

  • No invented recovery, exemption or automatic overall opinion.
Official concept source: ICAI Bank Audit module references Moduleadvancesevidencepages 35-38

AUD-G14-D021 · 5 marks

A positive accrual on an ordinary NPA An ordinary loan becomes NPA. Rs 9 lakh prior accrued interest credited to income is unrealised. Another Rs 2 lakh uncollected accrued fee remains in income; staff continue current interest accrual as income and include later memorandum interest in gross advances. Assume eligible commercial-bank scope under paragraph 3 and no special restructuring, guarantee-cover, lease or other exception unless supplied. Required: Correct five income/recording treatments. (5 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditCase application / answer
1Use cash rather than normal accrual income recognition for the ordinary NPA.Paragraph 125 does not permit ordinary accrual simply because interest is contractually due.
1Reverse unrealised past interest credited to income.Paragraph 128 requires reversal of the supplied Rs 9 lakh, with no supplied 129 moratorium exception.
1Cease accrued fee/commission-type income and reverse uncollected past accrual.Paragraph 130 applies to the supplied Rs 2 lakh fee; total identified unrealised reversals are Rs 11 lakh.
1Stop further application as income and maintain the required memorandum record.Paragraphs 132-133 distinguish reversal/cessation from tracking accrued interest.
1Exclude memorandum interest from gross advances.Paragraph 134 prevents inflating the gross advances figure with that memorandum amount.

Non-credit errors

  • No invented recovery, exemption or predetermined overall opinion.
Official concept source: RBI commercial-bank IRACP updated October1,2026 references 124-125,128,130,132-134

AUD-G14-D022 · 5 marks

Fresh lending funds an apparent interest receipt The bank credits Rs 4 lakh to an NPA interest account out of a fresh additional loan to that borrower. A separate genuine borrower-funded interest receipt Rs 1 lakh is verified. There is no clear recovery-appropriation agreement, and managers alternate principal-first and interest-first to improve quarterly income. Assume eligible commercial-bank scope under paragraph 3 and no special restructuring, guarantee-cover, lease or other exception unless supplied. Required: Explain income and appropriation limits. (5 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditCase application / answer
1Trace the origin of credits before treating them as realised NPA income.The supplied Rs 4 lakh credit is from fresh additional borrower lending, not an independent recovery.
1Apply the fresh/additional-credit restriction.Paragraph 135 does not permit taking that funded Rs 4 lakh interest credit to income on this basis.
1Consider actual verified interest recovery separately.The Rs 1 lakh genuine interest receipt may be taken to income under 135 subject to supported classification/appropriation facts.
1Use a uniform consistent appropriation principle where agreement is absent.Paragraph 136 does not permit opportunistic quarterly switching.
1Document receipt source and appropriation policy/application.Investigate actual account transactions and reporting adjustments, without claiming every credit necessarily cures NPA status.

Non-credit errors

  • No invented recovery, exemption or predetermined overall opinion.
Official concept source: RBI commercial-bank IRACP updated October1,2026 references 135-136

AUD-G14-D023 · 3 marks

A moratorium entry is not automatically overdue An industrial project loan has a valid sanction-time interest moratorium still running. Interest has been debited, but its contractual payment due date has not arrived. Staff count overdue days from that debit. Assume eligible commercial-bank scope under paragraph 3 and no special restructuring, guarantee-cover, lease or other exception unless supplied. Required: Explain the due-date and classification limits. (3 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditCase application / answer
1Use the contractual permitted moratorium/gestation due point.Paragraph 56(1) says interest becomes due only after that period, not merely on debit.
1Do not treat the supplied not-yet-due interest as overdue from debit.Overdue status arises after due date if uncollected; the staff clock is wrong.
1Assess other applicable facts/triggers separately.The supplied interest fact alone is not proof the entire account must be NPA or forever standard; verify sanction terms and other repayment obligations.

Non-credit errors

  • No invented recovery, exemption or predetermined overall opinion.
Official concept source: RBI commercial-bank IRACP updated October1,2026 references 56(1),5(8)

AUD-G14-D024 · 5 marks

Central guarantee, state guarantee and income Two ordinary facilities are overdue 120 days. One has a verified Central Government guarantee which has not been repudiated when invoked; the other has a State Government guarantee. Staff apply identical standard classification and interest accrual to both. Assume eligible commercial-bank scope under paragraph 3 and no special restructuring, guarantee-cover, lease or other exception unless supplied. Required: Distinguish guarantee classification and income treatment. (5 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditCase application / answer
1Apply the specific Central Government classification rule.Paragraph 58(1) treats such guaranteed overdue facilities as NPA only when Government repudiates the invoked guarantee; the supplied non-repudiation condition differs.
1Do not extend that Central exemption to income recognition.Paragraph 58(2) explicitly says the exemption is not for income recognition, so normal accrual is not justified just by guarantee.
1Apply State guarantee more-than 90 day classification/provision norms.Paragraph 58(3) applies on the supplied 120 day arrears; State backing is not the Central exception.
1Apply supported NPA income-recognition treatment to the State account.Paragraph 125 requires cash-basis recognition for nonstandard facilities; do not accrue merely on guarantee.
1Verify guarantor identity, invocation/repudiation and recovery.Distinguish actual legal guarantee facts from a generic government label; assess required provisions/reporting separately.

Non-credit errors

  • No invented recovery, exemption or predetermined overall opinion.
Official concept source: RBI commercial-bank IRACP updated October1,2026 references 58;125

AUD-G14-D025 · 10 marks

Two substandard assets, one wrong security deduction An ordinary secured substandard advance is Rs 200 lakh. Another ordinary non-infrastructure substandard exposure is Rs 80 lakh and meets the Direction unsecured-exposure definition on verified facts. The bank has provided Rs 18 lakh and Rs 10 lakh respectively. Management wants to deduct collateral from the first base and use 15 percent for both. Assume eligible commercial-bank scope under paragraph 3 and no special restructuring, guarantee-cover, lease or other exception unless supplied. Required: Compute the ordinary requirements and shortfalls, explain the distinction and evidence checks. (10 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditCase application / answer
1Confirm supplied substandard category and eligible scope.Use the verified class rather than infer it only from collateral; no special exception is supplied.
1Use total outstanding for ordinary substandard provision.Paragraph 85 does not permit subtracting security or ECGC cover from the Rs 200 lakh base.
1Apply 15 percent to the secured substandard amount.Rs 200 x 15 percent = Rs 30 lakh.
1Compute first provision shortfall Rs 12 lakh.Required Rs 30 less recorded Rs 18 = Rs 12.
1Apply the additional 10 percent for ordinary unsecured substandard exposure.Paragraph 86 makes total 25 percent, not 15 percent, on the Rs 80 lakh balance.
1Compute second required provision Rs 20 lakh.Rs 80 x 25 percent = Rs 20.
1Compute second shortfall Rs 10 lakh.Required Rs 20 less recorded Rs 10 = Rs 10.
1Compute total required Rs 50 lakh and shortage Rs 22 lakh.Recorded total Rs 28 versus required Rs 50; reconcile the account-wise calculation.
1Do not import the special infrastructure 20 percent rate.Paragraph 87 requires its supplied safeguards/type; this second exposure is explicitly non-infrastructure.
1Verify category, balances and unsecured/security facts and address adjustments.Obtain current records and supported treatment; arithmetic does not automatically decide the overall audit opinion.

Non-credit errors

  • No invented recovery, exemption or predetermined overall opinion.
Official concept source: RBI commercial-bank IRACP updated October1,2026 references 73,85-87

AUD-G14-D026 · 5 marks

Doubtful for two years, secured only in part An ordinary advance Rs 150 lakh has remained doubtful for two years. Realisable security with valid bank recourse is Rs 90 lakh, realistically verified. Recorded provision is Rs 60 lakh. Staff apply 40 percent to the whole amount. Assume eligible commercial-bank scope under paragraph 3 and no special restructuring, guarantee-cover, lease or other exception unless supplied. Required: Split and compute the correct provision and shortfall. (5 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditCase application / answer
1Identify secured Rs 90 lakh and uncovered Rs 60 lakh.Rs 150-Rs 90 = Rs 60; valid realistic recourse is supplied, not nominal collateral value.
1Provide 100 percent for the uncovered portion.Paragraph 90 requires Rs 60 lakh.
1Apply the two-year doubtful secured rate 40 percent.Paragraph 91 gives Rs 90 x 40 percent = Rs 36 lakh, not 40 percent of the whole account.
1Compute total required Rs 96 lakh and shortfall Rs 36 lakh.Rs 60+Rs 36 = Rs 96; recorded Rs 60 leaves Rs 36.
1Recheck category duration/security/balance evidence and accounting.Do not use a 15 percent substandard rate or claim the provision cures classification/overall opinion matters.

Non-credit errors

  • No invented recovery, exemption or predetermined overall opinion.
Official concept source: RBI commercial-bank IRACP updated October1,2026 references 90-91

AUD-G14-D027 · 5 marks

Security erosion crosses two different thresholds An NPA security was previously assessed Rs 100 lakh, now realistically Rs 45 lakh. Its outstanding is Rs 300 lakh. A separate borrower has security Rs 8 lakh against Rs 100 lakh outstanding. Management insists both must pass sequentially through substandard first. Assume eligible commercial-bank scope under paragraph 3 and no special restructuring, guarantee-cover, lease or other exception unless supplied. Required: Apply the erosion tests and distinguish denominators. (5 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditCase application / answer
1Apply the first erosion comparison to previous assessed security.Rs 45/Rs 100=45 percent, below 50 percent under 68(1).
1Consider direct doubtful treatment for the first supplied NPA.The significant erosion supports the stated straight-to-doubtful route, not compulsory waiting through all age stages.
1Apply the loss test to outstanding, not prior-security value.For the second borrower Rs 8/Rs 100=8 percent, below 10 percent under 68(2).
1Ignore security and apply direct loss treatment to the second case.The supplied below 10 percent condition is the stated loss route.
1Keep the first loss comparison separate and verify values.Rs 45/Rs 300=15 percent does not itself meet the below 10 percent loss trigger; use appropriate 67-68 facts, not one common denominator or an equality-is-less-than fiction.

Non-credit errors

  • No invented recovery, exemption or predetermined overall opinion.
Official concept source: RBI commercial-bank IRACP updated October1,2026 references 67-68

AUD-G14-D028 · 5 marks

Partial write-off and an unfinished arrears cure A borrower has two NPA facilities. It clears principal arrears only on the first, leaving interest arrears on it and arrears on the second. The bank technically writes off part of the remaining exposure and proposes standard classification for the residual. Assume eligible commercial-bank scope under paragraph 3 and no special restructuring, guarantee-cover, lease or other exception unless supplied. Required: Apply upgradation and write-off limits. (5 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditCase application / answer
1Require entire arrears of interest and principal for ordinary upgradation.Paragraph 69 is not satisfied by principal-only payment.
1Apply the all-credit-facilities condition.Paragraph 71 requires repayment of entire relevant arrears across both supplied facilities.
1Recognise the continuing interest and second-facility arrears.The supplied incomplete cure prevents the proposed ordinary upgrade.
1Do not show the residual after partial/technical write-off as standard on that ground.Paragraph 72 blocks this relabelling shortcut.
1Trace actual repayments/write-offs and separately assess special rules if relevant.No restructuring/DCCOexception is supplied; do not infer it from an accounting write-off or claim write-off equals cash recovery.

Non-credit errors

  • No invented recovery, exemption or predetermined overall opinion.
Official concept source: RBI commercial-bank IRACP updated October1,2026 references 69-72

AUD-G14-D029 · 3 marks

Loss recognised, a small salvage estimate remains An ordinary advance Rs 40 lakh is verified a loss asset, remains in books and has only speculative salvage prospects. Management proposes a 20 percent provision because something might be recovered. Assume eligible commercial-bank scope under paragraph 3 and no special restructuring, guarantee-cover, lease or other exception unless supplied. Required: Apply the loss-asset treatment. (3 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditCase application / answer
1Recognise that some salvage does not negate supplied loss status.Paragraph 66 allows loss classification despite some salvage/recovery value.
1Apply write-off requirement or full outstanding provision if retained.Paragraphs 94-95 require Rs 40 lakh 100 percent provision on the supplied retained balance, not Rs 8 lakh.
1Verify accounting and supported recovery facts separately.Speculative salvage is not cash receipt or permission to apply an unsupported lower loss rate.

Non-credit errors

  • No invented recovery, exemption or predetermined overall opinion.
Official concept source: RBI commercial-bank IRACP updated October1,2026 references 66,94-95

AUD-G14-D030 · 10 marks

Short provisioning hidden only in LFAR The branch audit identifies a supported short provision and unreliable system overrides. Management offers to put the issues in LFAR, keep financial numbers unchanged and issue the main report clean. A system status screenshot is offered instead of override-authorisation trails; a proposed MOC is not yet posted. The question does not ask for an LFAR deadline or a universal sampling threshold. Required: Explain the distinct correction/reporting/evidence steps without automatic opinion selection. (10 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditCase application / answer
1Verify the supported short-provision finding against current norms.Reconcile classification, balances and applicable rates/security rather than rely on a broad system label.
1Propose appropriate correction/MOC for financial-number effects.The identified short provision needs its supported accounting response, not LFAR disclosure instead of correction.
1Check whether the MOC was actually accepted/posted and reflected.A proposed adjustment is not evidence that the final statements are corrected.
1Evaluate relevant LFAR adverse-account/system findings.Include actual significant observations with clear facts, not an unexplained generic comment.
1Do not treat LFAR as substitute for required main-report modification.Guide 25.35 expressly distinguishes these reporting channels.
1Assess main-report implications under applicable standards from final facts.Materiality, evidence and correction status determine the response; no automatic qualified/adverse choice follows from every observation.
1Assess system override policy and required authorisation.Current RBI 38 requires supported exceptional treatment and at least two-level authorisation, not only a screenshot.
1Obtain appropriate audit trails and review exceptional intervention.Missing trails require investigation and responsive procedures; a standard-status screenshot is not the performance evidence.
1Preserve separate evidence for control weakness and provision amounts.One issue does not prove every balance wrong; obtain supported scope and quantify known effects.
1Communicate/document conclusions and unresolved matters appropriately.Keep accurate LFAR/main-report/MOC status and do not describe an unposted correction or unreviewed override as completed.

Non-credit errors

  • No invented recovery, exemption or predetermined overall opinion.
Official concept source: ICAI bank guide2026 references ICAIguide 25.35;RBI 38 sourceinlinks