Group 16: Cooperative Society Audit

30 original descriptive cases. Descriptive mix: 5 at 3 marks, 19 at 5 marks, 6 at 10 marks.

Original practice, not ICAI questions, official suggested answers or an official examiner scheme. Equivalent correct work is credited within the stated caps. Public practice availability is not full official question-bank completion.

Concurrent thresholds, State rates and regulatory norms are not invented.

AUD-G16-D001 · 3 marks

Registration decides the legal starting point A single-State cooperative credit society and a society registered under the Multi-State Cooperative Societies Act 2002 are audited using identical appointment, shareholding and distribution rules copied from an old summary. Neither registration document nor applicable State law is inspected. Required: Apply the relevant cooperative-audit principles to these facts. (3 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditCase application / answer
1Identify each society's actual governing law.Inspect registration, objects, jurisdiction, governing Act/rules and operative bye-laws; a cooperative label does not establish identical law.
1Keep State and multi-state provisions separate.Do not apply the module's 1912 Act/State examples universally to the registered MSCS or apply MSCS rules universally to the State society.
1Check amendments and current directions.For the MSCS, read the consolidated 2023 amendments and applicable current audit orders; do not use a bare old summary as complete 2026 law.

Non-credit errors

  • No universal Registrar-appointment or statutory percentage for every cooperative.
Official concept source: Official cooperative-audit concept source references Printed9.59-9.60 jurisdiction;2023MSCSAct/currentCRCSorders

AUD-G16-D002 · 5 marks

A familiar accountant replaces the statutory auditor A registered non-bank MSCS appoints a trusted bookkeeper who is not a chartered accountant and is not on the applicable approved auditor panel. Management says qualifications accepted under a different State society law and years of friendship suffice. Required: Apply the relevant cooperative-audit principles to these facts. (5 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditCase application / answer
1Apply the MSCS qualification rule.Section 72(1) requires a chartered accountant; a different State qualification route is not this MSCS rule.
1Apply the approved-panel condition.Section 70(2) as amended requires appointment from the Central Registrar-approved panel; trust does not replace panel eligibility.
1Check the actual applicable current panel category.For this non-bank MSCS use the relevant current statutory panel/order, not the concurrent panel or an obsolete list by assumption.
1Assess other disqualifications and conflicts.Being aCA/panel firm is not the end of the test; verify section 72 and current-order independence conditions.
1Do not treat bookkeeping familiarity as lawful appointment.Resolve eligibility/appointment with the proper society authority before issuing a statutory report; a familiar person cannot certify eligibility by assertion.

Non-credit errors

  • Years of bookkeeping do not override statutory qualification or panel requirements.
Official concept source: Official cooperative-audit concept source references Sections70(2),72;CRCS30April2026order

AUD-G16-D003 · 5 marks

The board leaves the first audit unappointed An MSCS board does not appoint its first auditor within one month of registration. The secretary signs a private appointment note instead, without a general meeting. Management says subsequent AGM appointment rules and the secretary's convenience cure the failure. Required: Apply the relevant cooperative-audit principles to these facts. (5 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditCase application / answer
1Identify the first-auditor rule.Section 70(6) assigns first appointment to the board within one month of registration.
1Identify the first auditor's initial term.That first appointment runs until conclusion of the first AGM, rather than automatically all subsequent years.
1Identify the statutory failure route.If the board fails, the society in general meeting may appoint the first auditor; a secretary note is not that route.
1Separate subsequent appointment mechanics.Section 70(2) covers AGM appointments; do not erase the distinct first-appointment provision.
1Verify actual eligibility and authority.Check the valid appointment/panel and qualification requirements as applicable, original minutes and current directions; do not assume the note constitutes a lawful appointment.

Non-credit errors

  • Do not claim secretary signature equals board/general-meeting appointment.
Official concept source: Official cooperative-audit concept source references Section70(2),(6)

AUD-G16-D004 · 10 marks

Annual appointment mechanics and current continuity direction A non-bank MSCS properly appoints an eligible statutory audit firm forFY 2025-26. The firm remains eligible and empanelled in FY 2026-27. Management wants to switch it for a cheaper firm after only one year, without prior CRCS approval. It cites section 70(2)'s AGM-to-next-AGM wording and an old district-only panel restriction. The applicable 30 April 2026 order and 1 July 2026 corrigendum are supplied; no later revision exists for this exercise. Required: Apply the relevant cooperative-audit principles to these facts. (10 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditCase application / answer
1Read the annual statutory mechanics accurately.Section 70(2) provides AGM appointment/term to next AGM; do not falsely say that provision was deleted.
1Identify the current panel order.The 30 April 2026 order supersedes specified earlier panels and applies in FY 2026-27 until a revised panel; use the operative layer.
1Identify the non-bank statutory category.Use the current non-bank statutory panel, not a bank category or concurrent panel merely because a firm appears elsewhere.
1Identify the added continuity requirement.The 1 July corrigendum inserts same statutory auditor/firm for three consecutive years, subject to continuing eligibility/empanelment.
1Apply the supplied continuing eligibility facts.The incumbent remains eligible/empanelled, so the stated exception for failure of those conditions is not supplied.
1Apply the mid-period change condition.Changing for cheaper fees is a different reason and requires prior CRCS approval under the inserted clause; do not assume AGM wording alone removes it.
1Distinguish the allowed eligibility-failure replacement.If eligibility or empanelment later fails, the order permits another eligible approved-panel firm without prior approval on that basis; that is not the present fact.
1Correct the geographical restriction claim.The 30 April order relaxes district selection to the whole State of head office; it is not unrestricted nationwide selection under this order.
1Check related current independence conditions.Verify section 72 and order conditions for firms/relatives/business interests and fraud convictions rather than treat panel presence as conclusive eligibility.
1Document a lawful path without inventing repeal.Explain statutory annual mechanics plus operative continuity/approval conditions; obtain needed prior approval if pursuing the price-driven change rather than declare the old appointment invalid automatically.

Non-credit errors

  • No claim that the three-year direction repealed all annualAGM mechanics; no price-driven change without needed prior approval.
Official concept source: Official cooperative-audit concept source references 1July2026corrigendumclause2(viii);30April2026order2(ii)-(vii);Act70(2)

AUD-G16-D005 · 5 marks

Panel membership hides a prohibited business relationship A statutory audit firm appears on the applicable current MSCS panel. A partner's relative has a non-audit business relationship with the society and holds its shares. The firm argues that inclusion on the list conclusively settles independence. Required: Apply the relevant cooperative-audit principles to these facts. (5 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditCase application / answer
1Do not treat empanelment as complete eligibility.The current order separately requires qualification/disqualification and relationship checks.
1Identify the relative-linked restriction.30 April 2026 order 2(v) covers the person/firm and relatives, as defined, with specified interest/business relationships, shareholding, loans or employment.
1Test the actual relationship evidence.Inspect the relevant partner/relative connections, shares and contract rather than assume the relative definition or holding from a name alone.
1Check the governing section 72 conditions too.Panel conditions sit alongside the statutory disqualifications, not instead of them.
1Address the supplied conflict before accepting the audit.The supplied relevant business/share relationship defeats the firm's blanket claim; determine lawful eligibility/replacement and report the issue through proper appointment channels.

Non-credit errors

  • No immunity from conflict rules just because a firm is listed.
Official concept source: Official cooperative-audit concept source references 30April2026order2(iv)-(v)

AUD-G16-D006 · 3 marks

An auditor borrows after appointment A duly appointed MSCS auditor becomes personally indebted to the society by Rs 5000 during the term. No exception is supplied. Management says disqualification is checked only on the first day. Required: Apply the relevant cooperative-audit principles to these facts. (3 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditCase application / answer
1Apply the indebtedness condition.Section 72(2)(d) includes indebtedness exceeding Rs 1000; the supplied Rs 5000 exceeds it.
1Apply post-appointment consequence.Section 72(4) deems the office vacated when the auditor becomes subject to the specified disqualifications; the first-day-only claim is wrong.
1Assess the required lawful replacement.Document actual debt/eligibility status and use the applicable appointment/current-order route; do not continue signing as if no change occurred.

Non-credit errors

  • No invented waiver because the debt arose after appointment.
Official concept source: Official cooperative-audit concept source references Section72(2)(d),(4)

AUD-G16-D007 · 5 marks

Resignation creates a vacancy, not a free choice An MSCS auditor resigns. A manager appoints an unlisted friend to finish the report, although the approved panel from which the resigning auditor was appointed is known. The manager also treats the replacement as permanently appointed. Required: Apply the relevant cooperative-audit principles to these facts. (5 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditCase application / answer
1Identify the amended vacancy route.Section 70(7)(a) proviso covers resignation/death: the board fills the vacancy from the panel from which that auditor was appointed.
1Reject the manager-only shortcut.The supplied manager note is not the stated board action.
1Check the replacement's panel/qualification.An unlisted friend does not satisfy the supplied panel requirement; section 72/current eligibility also matter.
1Identify the casual-vacancy term.Section 70(7)(b) runs until conclusion of the next AGM, not a permanent appointment.
1Reconcile current continuity/change conditions.Review current order and reason for change together with statutory vacancy mechanics; do not assume all replacement cases have identical approval requirements.

Non-credit errors

  • Resignation does not create an unrestricted permanent appointment power.
Official concept source: Official cooperative-audit concept source references Section70(7);amended2023proviso/currentorder

AUD-G16-D008 · 10 marks

Cash shares, personal expenses and book-entry repayment An MSCS reports Rs 12 lakh cash share allotments but only Rs 9 lakh receipts can be traced. It includes Rs 1.2 lakh of a director's personal holiday in member-service expense. A Rs 4 lakh overdue loan is marked repaid by a journal transfer to a suspense account, with no receipt or substantiated discharge. Securities described as supporting another loan have no executed charge evidence. Management says ledger balance and an eligible auditor mean no special inquiries are needed. Required: Apply the relevant cooperative-audit principles to these facts. (10 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditCase application / answer
1Apply the statutory inquiries despite ledger agreement.Section 73(2) requires the supplied loan/security, book-entry, personal-expense and cash-share inquiries; auditor eligibility does not remove them.
1Quantify the cash-share receipt gap.Rs 12 lakh stated cash allotments less Rs 9 lakh traced receipts is Rs 3 lakh needing explanation/evidence.
1Verify actual cash versus non-cash status.Trace allotment records/bank receipts/member balances and assess whether accounts describe unpaid/non-cash shares correctly, regularly and without misleading users.
1Investigate personal-expense charging.Rs 1.2 lakh holiday is supplied personal spending; assess recovery/receivable and correction under the applicable accounting facts, not relabel it member service.
1Do not treat journal credit as genuine loan repayment.The Rs 4 lakh suspense transfer lacks recovery/discharge evidence; inspect legal substance and retained borrower obligation.
1Assess prejudicial book entries.Determine whether the entry hides overdue exposure or harms society/member interests; a balanced journal is not itself substantive recovery.
1Verify security validity and terms.Obtain executed security/charge and loan terms; a description does not establish proper security or non-prejudicial terms.
1Seek supported management explanations and further evidence.Reconcile source documents, borrower/member records, bank receipts and expense authorisation rather than accept convenient totals.
1Avoid double-counted or automatic loss claims.Rs 3 lakh receipt gap,Rs 1.2 lakh personal spending and Rs 4 lakh journal issue differ; do not label every rupee irrecoverable or prove fraud solely from these facts.
1Reflect supported findings and reasons in reporting.Evaluate required information, books, account treatment and implications for the section 73 report; give reasons for negative/qualified matters without guessing an automatic opinion type.

Non-credit errors

  • No Rs 8.2 lakh automatic loss or guaranteed fraud finding; non-cash journals are not automatically impermissible, their substance must be tested.
Official concept source: Official cooperative-audit concept source references Section73(1)-(5)

AUD-G16-D009 · 5 marks

Branches send totals without an adequate return An MSCS has two unvisited branches. One supplies only a profit total without assets, liabilities or source support; another was audited separately but the branch audit report is not forwarded. The main auditor treats arithmetic consolidation as sufficient statutory reporting. Required: Apply the relevant cooperative-audit principles to these facts. (5 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditCase application / answer
1Test whether branch returns are adequate.Section 73(4)(b) addresses proper books and adequate returns from unvisited branches; a profit total alone may not support the audit.
1Obtain the other branch auditor's report.Section 73(4)(c) asks whether it was forwarded and how it was dealt with; arithmetic is not a substitute.
1Assess agreement with books/returns.Section 73(4)(d) requires account agreement, including supported branch figures rather than guessed assets/liabilities.
1Assess information/explanation sufficiency.Resolve missing records and branch evidence under 73(1)/(4)(a), using appropriate further work and explanations.
1Report supported negative/qualified matters with reasons.Section 73(5) requires reasons; do not sign a clean assertion of adequate returns/report handling when those facts remain unsupported.

Non-credit errors

  • No assumption that exact totals establish adequate branch evidence.
Official concept source: Official cooperative-audit concept source references Section73(4)-(5)

AUD-G16-D010 · 5 marks

The report is withheld from members An MSCS secretary signs the statutory auditor report in the appointed auditor's place, refuses member inspection and says the auditor need not receive general-meeting notices. There is no valid replacement appointment. Required: Apply the relevant cooperative-audit principles to these facts. (5 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditCase application / answer
1Apply report-signature authority.Section 74 says only the person appointed auditor signs/authenticates documents required by law to be signed by auditor; secretary convenience is not that appointment.
1Apply general-meeting reading.Section 75 requires the auditor report to be read before the society in general meeting.
1Apply member inspection.Section 75 makes the report open to inspection by any member; a management-only copy does not fulfil it.
1Apply auditor meeting communications.Section 76 requires notices/communications that members are entitled to receive to be forwarded to the auditor as stated.
1Apply auditor attendance/hearing rights.The auditor may attend and be heard on business concerning the audit role; refusing every notice does not erase that right.

Non-credit errors

  • No substitution of secretary signature for a duly appointed auditor.
Official concept source: Official cooperative-audit concept source references Sections74-76

AUD-G16-D011 · 5 marks

A member's passbook does not match the loan ledger A cooperative credit society ledger shows a member owing Rs 72000. The member's passbook shows two repayments of Rs 8000 each omitted from the ledger; numbered receipts exist but bank/cash records have not been checked. Management calls the member's limited literacy a reason to disregard the passbook. Required: Apply the relevant cooperative-audit principles to these facts. (5 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditCase application / answer
1Use member records as a relevant evidence lead.Inspect the register, passbook, loan disbursement/repayment history and receipts; limited literacy does not discredit a supported repayment lead.
1Compute the apparent reconciliation difference.Two Rs 8000 repayments total Rs 16000; if genuine and applicable, the indicated balance would be Rs 56000, not Rs 72000.
1Corroborate actual collection and posting.Trace numbered receipts to cash/bank records, collection books and authorisation; a passbook alone is not final proof.
1Check member identity and obtain suitable direct confirmation.Verify the actual member/account and confirm the transaction/balance in an understandable manner rather than a management-only assertion.
1Investigate the control/reporting effect.Determine omitted postings, diversion risk and wider affected accounts, correct supported errors and report findings without assuming proved theft from the mismatch alone.

Non-credit errors

  • No automatic rejection of member evidence or unconditional Rs 56000 conclusion before corroboration.
Official concept source: Official cooperative-audit concept source references Cooperativeaudit13.3(7),members/passbooks

AUD-G16-D012 · 5 marks

Salary deductions collected but not remitted A credit society receives an employer schedule showing Rs 2.4 lakh deductions for member-loan repayments. Only Rs 1.8 lakh reaches its bank by year-end. The society marks every loan fully credited and says the employer list is cash evidence. The supplied contracts do not discharge member obligations merely on deduction; the legal status of the remaining claim needs assessment. Required: Apply the relevant cooperative-audit principles to these facts. (5 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditCase application / answer
1Reconcile deduction schedule to actual remittance.The schedule Rs 2.4 lakh less receipts Rs 1.8 lakh leaves Rs 0.6 lakh unmatched.
1Do not equate payroll deduction with bank receipt.Inspect employer remittance records, subsequent receipts and member subledgers; the list alone is not received cash.
1Allocate actual remittances correctly.Trace the Rs 1.8 lakh to specific members/periods rather than guess every member paid in full.
1Assess outstanding member/employer claim treatment.Apply the supplied non-discharge terms and actual legal evidence; do not invent simultaneous discharge or double-count recoverable amounts.
1Address collection controls and reporting.Investigate delayed/short remittance, reconciliations and follow-up; correct supported postings and disclose/report unresolved material amounts appropriately.

Non-credit errors

  • Rs 0.6 lakh unmatched is not automatically an irrecoverable loss or proved fraud.
Official concept source: Official cooperative-audit concept source references Books/subsidiaryloanrecoveryregisters13.2;members/passbooks13.3

AUD-G16-D013 · 3 marks

An expired membership supports a new loan A society's supplied operative loan policy permits new loans only to active eligible members. The borrower register shows membership ceased before disbursement, but the manager uses an old member number as sole approval evidence. No exception or reinstatement is supplied. Required: Apply the relevant cooperative-audit principles to these facts. (3 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditCase application / answer
1Verify eligibility at the actual disbursement date.An old number does not establish current active membership under the supplied rule.
1Trace the membership and loan authority records.Inspect cessation/reinstatement records, application, approval and disbursement rather than rely only on the historic register entry.
1Evaluate the supplied policy breach and consequences.Assess recovery, authorisation and financial/reporting implications; do not invent an exception or declare all principal lost solely from eligibility failure.

Non-credit errors

  • The exercisepolicy is supplied, not asserted as everyState/MSCS loan statute.
Official concept source: Official cooperative-audit concept source references 13.2loanrestrictions and13.3membership/controlchecks

AUD-G16-D014 · 10 marks

Overdue ageing is replaced by optimistic labels A non-bank cooperative credit society has four loan balances in lakh: A 20, B 12, C 8 and D 10. Verified recoverable amounts are respectively 16, 9, 0 and 10 under the expressly supplied exercise valuation framework; no other adjustments apply. Its policy requires allowance equal to carrying amount minus supported recoverable amount, with no negative allowance. Management records total allowance only Rs 3 lakh because every account is labelled good. Ages are 2 months, 8 months, 6 years and 4 months respectively. The applicable ageing/reporting bands are supplied separately by the society; no RBI NPA rule is supplied. Required: Apply the relevant cooperative-audit principles to these facts. (10 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditCase application / answer
1Use the expressly supplied valuation framework.This is a recoverable-amount exercise, not a universal cooperative bank prudential rate or automatic age-based percentage.
1Compute A allowance.20 minus 16 equals Rs 4 lakh.
1Compute B allowance.12 minus 9 equals Rs 3 lakh.
1Compute C allowance.8 minus 0 equals Rs 8 lakh based on supplied evidence.
1Compute D allowance.10 minus 10 equals zero; do not create a negative or automatic age-only allowance.
1Compute total required allowance.4+3+8+0 equals Rs 15 lakh.
1Compute recorded-allowance shortfall.Required 15 less recorded 3 equals Rs 12 lakh additional allowance on these facts.
1Separate ageing classification from recovery valuation.Ages help identify risk and prescribed reporting bands, but good labels or age alone do not replace supported recovery estimates.
1Corroborate recovery and completeness evidence.Inspect receipts, security validity, borrower capacity, subsequent events and full loan population, applying actual governing criteria.
1Report supported adjustments and uncertainty.Explain the Rs 12 lakh gap and actual overdue reporting under supplied bands; do not call every aged loan an RBI NPA or automatically a criminal fraud.

Non-credit errors

  • No imported 90-day commercial bank rule, no universal 6 month provision rate, no automatic entire Rs 50 lakh loss.
Official concept source: Official cooperative-audit concept source references 13.3overdue debts/valuation;explicitexerciseframework

AUD-G16-D015 · 5 marks

Profit includes interest on overdue principal A non-bank cooperative credit society's supplied accounting framework requires excluding unrealised interest on the identified overdue principal from distributable profit. Its draft profit is Rs 9 lakh and contains Rs 1.5 lakh such unrealised interest. Management says the accrual journal proves collection. No other profit adjustment is supplied. Required: Apply the relevant cooperative-audit principles to these facts. (5 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditCase application / answer
1Apply the supplied framework rather than universalise the rule.The exclusion is an explicit exercise condition linked to module overdue-interest discussion, not a claim about every 2026 cooperative bank.
1Verify the identified overdue principal and interest amount.Inspect loan terms, dates, accrued amount and receipt status; a journal alone does not prove realisation.
1Compute the profit effect.Rs 9 lakh less Rs 1.5 lakh equals Rs 7.5 lakh before any other applicable adjustments.
1Check proper accounting presentation/entries.Use the applicable framework to remove the unsupported profit inclusion or required reserve treatment; do not subtract the principal again.
1Reassess distribution using supported profit.Do not approve distribution from Rs 9 lakh merely from ledger accrual; verify legal/bye-law conditions and disclose/report the corrected basis.

Non-credit errors

  • No blanketNPA-income rule or double subtraction of principal and interest.
Official concept source: Official cooperative-audit concept source references 13.3(2)overdueinterest;suppliedframework

AUD-G16-D016 · 5 marks

Bad-debt certification is copied across jurisdictions For Society E, the exercise supplies an operative rule requiring auditor certification before bad-debt write-off. Society F's supplied rule instead requires managing-committee authorisation and does not impose that certification requirement. E writes off on a manager memo; F's team invents a certification mandate solely from a Maharashtra example in the module. Required: Apply the relevant cooperative-audit principles to these facts. (5 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditCase application / answer
1Establish each operative rule separately.The two supplied rules differ; the module State example is not automatically universal.
1Apply E's certification condition.A manager memo is not the required auditor certification; obtain evidence and assess lawful write-off approval.
1Apply F's authorisation condition.Use the supplied committee requirement and verified minutes rather than invent extra statutory certification.
1Evaluate irrecoverability independently of paperwork.Inspect recovery/security evidence, estimates and account treatment; approval alone does not prove every balance irrecoverable.
1Report actual gaps accurately.Explain E's missing certification and any F authorisation/evidence gap without claiming identical jurisdiction or writing off both automatically.

Non-credit errors

  • No universalMaharashtra 1961 rule transplanted to all societies.
Official concept source: Official cooperative-audit concept source references 13.3(3)baddebts conditionaljurisdiction

AUD-G16-D017 · 5 marks

Share limits in the bye-laws are tighter than management assumes The supplied valid operative bye-laws cap an ordinary member at 10% of total paid-up share capital Rs 40 lakh. One member holds Rs 5 lakh and proposes another Rs 1 lakh subscription; no exemption or rule change applies. Management uses a 20% figure from a different source and calls the whole subscription permissible. Required: Apply the relevant cooperative-audit principles to these facts. (5 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditCase application / answer
1Use the actual supplied tighter operative limit.10% of Rs 40 lakh gives Rs 4 lakh on the stated fixed capital basis, not an automatic 20% substitution.
1Quantify existing excess on that basis.Rs 5 lakh less Rs 4 lakh is Rs 1 lakh over the supplied limit.
1Assess the proposed holding.Adding Rs 1 lakh would produce Rs 6 lakh if accepted; under the exercise fixed denominator it exceeds the limit by Rs 2 lakh.
1Verify legal/bye-law compatibility and calculation basis.Inspect the operative valid rule, ordinary-member status and whether a real proposedcapital change affects denominator; the exerciseexplicitly fixes this basis.
1Address approval and reporting rather than assume permissible subscription.Resolve existing/proposed excess under the applicable process and report financial/compliance implications without inventing a refund penalty or exemption.

Non-credit errors

  • Fixeddenominatorexercise notuniversalstatutorysubscriptionformula; 20%ceilingdoes notcancelstrictervalidlimit.
Official concept source: Official cooperative-audit concept source references 13.2shareholdinglimits/operativebylaws;MSCSsection33hasupperboundnotuniversal20%entitlement

AUD-G16-D018 · 10 marks

Member benefit and an unexplained intermediary A cooperative purchasing society buys 1000 identical bags at Rs 800 each and pays an intermediary Rs 60000 with no service support. A comparable supplied direct delivered quote is Rs 820 per bag for the same quality, timing and terms. It sells 900 bags to members at Rs 850 each; 100 remain with verified cost Rs 800 per bag and net realisable amount Rs 760 per bag. The supplied framework uses lower of cost and net realisable value; no other costs/adjustments apply. Management says a positive trading margin proves all cooperative objectives met and the intermediary charge useful. Required: Apply the relevant cooperative-audit principles to these facts. (10 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditCase application / answer
1Reconcile purchase cost.1000 times Rs 800 equals Rs 8 lakh for bags; intermediary fee Rs 0.6 lakh is a separate supported-cost question.
1Compute actual total acquisition outlay on supplied facts.Rs 8 lakh plus Rs 0.6 lakh equals Rs 8.6 lakh, subject to testing the fee's nature/accounting allocation.
1Compute the comparable direct outlay.1000 times Rs 820 equals Rs 8.2 lakh under the explicitly comparable delivered quote.
1Identify the comparison gap without assuming proved loss.Actual outlay exceeds comparator by Rs 0.4 lakh; investigate genuine service/benefit and decision evidence before an avoidable-cost verdict.
1Compute sales proceeds.900 times Rs 850 equals Rs 7.65 lakh.
1Compute sold-bag cost under the supplied bag-only comparison.900 times Rs 800 equals Rs 7.2 lakh; bag-only margin is Rs 0.45 lakh before the intermediary and other relevant costs.
1Value remaining inventory on the supplied framework.100 times lower of 800 and 760 equals Rs 76000, a Rs 4000 reduction from Rs 80000 bag-cost carrying amount.
1Assess intermediary evidence and correct cost treatment.Inspect service contract, related parties, actual work and whether fee is an inventory/acquisition cost or expense under the applicable framework; the bag-only margin is not final profit.
1Assess member benefit and objectives beyond profit.Verify member prices, access, quality and supply benefit; positive margin does not demonstrate every cooperative objective achieved.
1Report distinct supported findings and corrective needs.Explain comparison gap, unsupported service evidence and inventory reduction without double counting or declaring fraud/all outlay lost.

Non-credit errors

  • No final profitclaim from bag-onlymargin; feeallocationnotinvented; comparator suppliedsamequalitytermsnotunverifiedmarketprice.
Official concept source: Official cooperative-audit concept source references 13.3valuation/memberbenefits/propriety;explicitNRVframework

AUD-G16-D019 · 5 marks

A borrowed-funds limit is exceeded despite repayment capacity A society's supplied valid bye-laws cap non-member deposits at Rs 25 lakh. Its register shows Rs 31 lakh, excluding an additional Rs 4 lakh received but parked in suspense. Management says assets exceed liabilities, so the cap need not be checked. Required: Apply the relevant cooperative-audit principles to these facts. (5 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditCase application / answer
1Identify the operative limit and correct population.Test non-member deposits under the supplied valid rule; solvency does not waive the limit.
1Reconcile recorded and suspense deposits.Rs 31 lakh plus Rs 4 lakh equals Rs 35 lakh actual supplied non-member deposits.
1Compute the limit excess.Rs 35 lakh less Rs 25 lakh equals Rs 10 lakh over the exercise cap.
1Verify completeness and depositor status.Trace receipts, terms, suspense records, member register and liabilities; do not let a ledger label exclude a deposit.
1Assess lawful correction and reporting.Evaluate breach, obligations and supported remedial options under actual law/bye-laws; do not invent a penalty or assume assets eliminate deposit liabilities.

Non-credit errors

  • No universalborrowingcap or automatic Rs 10 lakh loss.
Official concept source: Official cooperative-audit concept source references 13.2borrowingrestrictions/bylaws;liabilitycompleteness

AUD-G16-D020 · 3 marks

Investment consent is assumed from a high return A cooperative's supplied valid investment rules require specific approval for a proposed investment category. The committee buys it without approval because the yield is attractive and the seller is familiar. No exemption exists. Required: Apply the relevant cooperative-audit principles to these facts. (3 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditCase application / answer
1Apply the supplied investment-authority condition.Yield and familiarity do not substitute for required category approval.
1Verify investment evidence and risk.Inspect ownership, terms, recoverability, actual approval records and whether the category is permitted under operative law/bye-laws.
1Report the supported breach and financial implications.Seek lawful corrective action and assess valuation/disclosure, not declare the investment valueless merely because consent was missing.

Non-credit errors

  • No universalinvestmentlist importedfromlegacy 1912 orStateexample.
Official concept source: Official cooperative-audit concept source references 13.2investmentrules;valuationandcompliance

AUD-G16-D021 · 10 marks

Profit is not all available for immediate dividends A non-bank MSCS has final correctly determined net profit Rs 20 lakh for the exercise year. It has been in profit in each of the preceding three financial years, and the supplied applicable section 63 A contribution base for this exercise is that Rs 20 lakh. No higher compulsory reserve percentage, prior losses, double-counted charge or other restriction is supplied. Management proposes distributing all Rs 20 lakh, paying nothing to education or rehabilitation funds and treating the 25% reserve minimum as the only condition. Apply the statutory minima and identify the remaining balance, not an automatically lawful dividend. Required: Apply the relevant cooperative-audit principles to these facts. (10 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditCase application / answer
1Use final net profit, not cash balance or capital funds.Section 62/63 concerns net profit; the exercise supplies a correctly determined Rs 20 lakh basis, not permission to distribute all society funds.
1Compute ordinary reserve minimum.Not less than 25% of Rs 20 lakh is Rs 5 lakh under 63(1)(a).
1Compute education contribution.One per cent of Rs 20 lakh is Rs 0.2 lakh under amended 63(1)(b), distinct from a zero-payment proposal.
1Compute unforeseen-loss reserve minimum.Not less than 10% of Rs 20 lakh is Rs 2 lakh under 63(1)(c); the 25% ordinary reserve does not replace it.
1Apply the section 63 A qualifying facts.Profit in each preceding three financial years is expressly supplied; do not apply this contribution universally to every society regardless of history.
1Compute the section 63 A amount on the supplied base.The lesser of Rs 1 crore and 1% of Rs 20 lakh is Rs 0.2 lakh, not Rs 1 crore automatically.
1Compute distinct required allocations/contribution on these facts.5+0.2+2+0.2 equals Rs 7.4 lakh, with no duplicate deduction or further adjustment supplied.
1Compute remaining balance carefully.Rs 20 lakh less Rs 7.4 lakh equals Rs 12.6 lakh remaining after these specified amounts, not a guaranteed lawful dividend.
1Check distribution conditions and operative bye-laws.Section 63(2) permits specified uses subject to prescribed conditions; check dividend limits, approvals and other actual restrictions before distribution.
1Check contribution compliance and reporting.Verify actual education payment under rule 25's six-month condition and evidence of rehabilitation contribution; report unmet requirements without inventing an unverified additional fund deadline.

Non-credit errors

  • Rs 12.6 lakh is a conditional residual, not automatic dividend; 63 A base is explicit, not a claim that its interpretation needs no checks.
Official concept source: Official cooperative-audit concept source references Sections62,63,63A;Rules2023rule25

AUD-G16-D022 · 5 marks

A statutory cap is applied to the wrong donation base A non-bank MSCS has correctly determined net profit Rs 30 lakh. A proposed donation Rs 2 lakh serves a permitted cooperative-development purpose. Other mandatory transfers and available funds are sufficient and separately verified, but management says the 5% donation cap in 63(2)(c) is calculated on totalassets Rs 100 lakh. Required: Apply the relevant cooperative-audit principles to these facts. (5 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditCase application / answer
1Identify the statutory donation base.Section 63(2)(c) uses net profits, not total assets.
1Compute the cap.5% of Rs 30 lakh equals Rs 1.5 lakh.
1Compute the proposal excess.Rs 2 lakh less Rs 1.5 lakh equals Rs 0.5 lakh over that cap.
1Keep purpose and amount tests separate.A permitted purpose does not itself cure an excessive amount; verify the actual category and conditions.
1Assess approval and compliant revision.Review the donation proposal/bye-laws/conditions and correct the unsupported asset-based calculation; do not assume all donations or the entire proposed Rs 2 lakh are unlawful in every respect.

Non-credit errors

  • No universalState donationrate or asset-basedcap.
Official concept source: Official cooperative-audit concept source references Section63(2)(c)

AUD-G16-D023 · 5 marks

The audit clock is confused with the appointment clock An MSCS auditor appointed under 70(2) submits its year-end audit report eight months after closing the financial year. Management says it complied because the society intimated appointment to the auditor within seven days and the auditor replied to the Central Registrar within thirty days. No extension or different applicable direction is supplied. Required: Apply the relevant cooperative-audit principles to these facts. (5 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditCase application / answer
1Separate appointment intimation.Section 70(2) seven-day society-to-auditor intimation concerns appointment, not report submission.
1Separate auditor acceptance/refusal communication.Section 70(3) thirty-day communication to Central Registrar runs from receipt of appointment intimation, not the financial-year close.
1Apply the amended report-submission rule.Section 70(3 A) requires the appointed 70(2) auditor to submit the audit accounts report to the society within six months of financial-year close.
1Apply the supplied delay.Eight months is outside the stated six-month window; compliance with other clocks does not cure it.
1Keep additional portal obligations distinct.The current order's society appointment reporting within one month is another obligation; verify actual submissions and report the specific delay without inventing a blanket penalty.

Non-credit errors

  • Seven days,thirty days,one month andsix months have different actors/triggers/purposes.
Official concept source: Official cooperative-audit concept source references Section70(2),(3),(3A);30April2026order2(vii)

AUD-G16-D024 · 3 marks

National status changes the report route A national cooperative society subject to the MSCSAct keeps its audit report only in the managing committee file. A different ordinary non-national MSCS is told that 70(10) requires its report before Parliament merely because it is multi-state. Required: Apply the relevant cooperative-audit principles to these facts. (3 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditCase application / answer
1Apply the national-society laying provision.Section 70(10) requires the audit report of accounts of national cooperative societies to be laid before each House of Parliament.
1Reject management-only retention for the national case.Keeping it only in the committee file does not perform that laying requirement; verify the lawful process.
1Do not universalise national status.The ordinary society is not shown to be national; 70(10) does not alone establish identical parliamentary laying for every MSCS. Other applicable member/report obligations remain.

Non-credit errors

  • No claim that every cooperative report has one universal parliamentary audience.
Official concept source: Official cooperative-audit concept source references Section70(10)

AUD-G16-D025 · 5 marks

Bank standards are copied to a non-bank society A non-bank MSCS team copies banking accounting standards and treats them as automatically mandatory because its name includes credit. No Central Government-determined standards for the specific exercise class are supplied; management also claims any internal policy can replace the statutory standards framework. Required: Apply the relevant cooperative-audit principles to these facts. (5 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditCase application / answer
1Identify section 73(6)'s general framework.Standards are those determined by the Central Government for the society/class as applicable, not chosen solely from a credit label.
1Apply the stated interim framework conditionally.Until such standards are specified, ICAI-specified auditing/accounting standards are deemed standards under the proviso; verify current determinations before a real conclusion.
1Separate the bank proviso.Multi-state cooperative banks adopt RBI standards if any laid down; the supplied non-bank is not made a bank by its name.
1Reject arbitrary management substitution.Internal policy cannot automatically override the applicable legal standards framework; inspect its consistency and actual accounting treatment.
1Plan and report using verified scope.Identify society type, operative standards and evidence; do not import commercial bankNPA rates or assert no newer standards exist merely because none are supplied.

Non-credit errors

  • A conditionalexercise lack of determinedstandards is not a blanket 2026 absence claim.
Official concept source: Official cooperative-audit concept source references Section73(6)

AUD-G16-D026 · 10 marks

Three subsidiary records disagree at year-end A cooperative has year-end loan ledger Rs 18 lakh and member confirmations totalling Rs 17 lakh. Numbered receipts Rs 1 lakh appear in the cash book but were not posted to member-loan accounts; actual banking of that Rs 1 lakh is not yet verified. Its stock ledger has 500 units at Rs 200, but verified physical count is 460, of which 40 have supported recoverable value Rs 120 each under the supplied lower-of-cost-and-recoverable-amount framework. A known supplier invoice Rs 18000 for goods already included in the physical count is omitted from liabilities; purchase/expense treatment needs tracing. Management proposes correcting only the loan ledger and certifying everything else. Required: Apply the relevant cooperative-audit principles to these facts. (10 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditCase application / answer
1Reconcile the loan difference.Rs 18 lakh less Rs 17 lakh equals Rs 1 lakh, matching the receipt-posting lead but not proving final recovery by itself.
1Corroborate member receipts and banking.Trace receipt sequence, members, cash book and bank deposits to verify genuine collection and avoid a cash/loan double correction.
1Correct supported loan postings and residual evidence.If genuine applicable collections are verified, loan accounts reduce accordingly; do not call the Rs 17 lakh confirmation total conclusive before reconciling population/timing.
1Compute recorded stock cost.500 times Rs 200 equals Rs 100000.
1Compute physical shortage at cost.40 missing units at Rs 200 equals Rs 8000, requiring cause/record checks rather than automatic theft.
1Compute condition-related reduction separately.Of the 460 present, 40 decline by Rs 80 each, giving Rs 3200 reduction; they are not the same 40 missing units.
1Compute supported physical inventory valuation.420 sound units at Rs 200 plus 40 damaged units at Rs 120 equals Rs 88800.
1Reconcile total inventory reduction without double counting.Rs 100000 less Rs 88800 equals Rs 11200, comprising Rs 8000 shortage and Rs 3200 condition reduction.
1Recognise the supplier-liability completeness issue.The Rs 18000 known invoice is not erased because stock exists; trace whether purchase/expense already recorded and avoid adding its goods again to inventory.
1Report all supported adjustments and open evidence.Explain loan posting, banking uncertainty, inventory reduction and omitted liability distinctly; one correction does not establish all accounts true/fair or prove a combined irrecoverable loss.

Non-credit errors

  • Rs 11200 inventoryadjustment not automaticallyfraud;Rs 18000 liabilitydoes not imply extra stock;Rs 1 lakh cashmustbeverified.
Official concept source: Official cooperative-audit concept source references 13.3memberpassbooks/valuation;13.2subsidiarybooks

AUD-G16-D027 · 5 marks

Solvency danger is not the only special-audit condition The Central Government considers an MSCS financial position to endanger solvency and proposes special audit under 77. Central/StateGovernments together hold only 40% of paid-up capital/shares, with no other shareholding facts or statutory route supplied. Management says solvency danger alone makes 77 available without the proviso. Required: Apply the relevant cooperative-audit principles to these facts. (5 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditCase application / answer
1Identify the proposed special-audit grounds.Section 77(1) includes dangerous financial position, among other stated grounds; this fact is relevant but not the whole provision.
1Apply the government-shareholding proviso.Central Government shall not order this special audit if the Governments individually/together hold less than 51% of paid-upshare capital/shares.
1Apply the supplied 40% fact.40% is below 51%; the stated 77 route is not established despite the solvency concern.
1Do not confuse alternative mechanisms.Annualstatutoryaudit or a properly grounded inquiry/inspection has its own scope; failure of 77 does not prove all examination prohibited.
1Communicate the legal/evidence distinction.Report the solvency risk and correct route conditions to proper authority, not invent extra government shares or an automatic special audit.

Non-credit errors

  • No automatic 77 audit from solvency danger alone; no universalimmunity conclusion.
Official concept source: Official cooperative-audit concept source references Section77(1)proviso

AUD-G16-D028 · 5 marks

A special auditor sends the report to the wrong audience For an MSCS special audit validly ordered under 77, the appointed auditor sends the report only to members, omits directions on an additional matter and says ordinary memberreporting necessarilycontrols. A valid Central Governmentdirection for the additional matter is supplied. Required: Apply the relevant cooperative-audit principles to these facts. (5 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditCase application / answer
1Identify the specialreportrecipient.Section 77(3) requires the special auditor to report to the Central Government instead of members under the ordinary 73 route.
1Retain relevant powers/duties.The special auditor has the 73 powers/duties for thisaudit, subject to the distinct report route.
1Include ordinary required matters as far as may be.Section 77(4) refers to matters required in 73 report; do not discard them just because audit is special.
1Include the validly directed additional matter.The supplied Central Governmentdirection invokes 77(4); scope cannot be silently omitted.
1Do not broaden or guess follow-up.Send/prepare under lawful authority and applicableprocess; distinguish later 77(6)government action/circulation from automatic immediate ordinary member route.

Non-credit errors

  • No universal members-only recipient for every MSCSaudit.
Official concept source: Official cooperative-audit concept source references Section77(3)-(6)

AUD-G16-D029 · 5 marks

Inquiry and inspection are mistaken for the annual audit A creditor requests an inquiry under 78(1) into an MSCSconstitution, working and financialcondition. The Central Registrar proposes holding it with onlyfive daysnotice, calling the annual audit's accessright a substitute for the inquiry notice. No alternative 78(1 A)/(1 B)route is invoked. Required: Apply the relevant cooperative-audit principles to these facts. (5 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditCase application / answer
1Identify the actual inquiry route.Section 78(1) covers specified requesters including a creditor; the supplied request is an inquiry, not ordinary annual audit.
1Apply the notice proviso to this route.No inquiry under 78(1) is held unless notice of not less than 15 days is given to the society.
1Apply the supplied notice gap.Five days is below 15; annual audit access wording does not cure this route notice condition.
1Preserve distinct 2023 inquiryroutes.78(1 A)/(1 B) add different powers; none is invoked here, so do not silently switch routes to erase the supplied gap.
1Plan within lawful authority and communicate findings.Verify request, authorisedperson/order and proper notice before the inquiry; distinguish constitution/working/financial review from the annual auditor account report.

Non-credit errors

  • No global claim that all 78 routes have identical conditions or that audit access cancels inquiry safeguards.
Official concept source: Official cooperative-audit concept source references Section78(1),(1A),(1B)

AUD-G16-D030 · 5 marks

Draft discussion becomes a veto over serious findings A society's supplied audit process calls for discussion of draft findings with the managing committee. The committee corrects a small posting error but demands that a supported personal profiteering transaction be deleted. It threatens to award its own audit class despite supplied Registrar criteria. Required: Apply the relevant cooperative-audit principles to these facts. (5 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditCase application / answer
1Use discussion for explanations and correction.Verify the posting correction and consider relevant responses; draft discussion is not evidence that every issue disappears.
1Preserve serious supported findings.Investigate/properly report the personalprofiteering issue under applicable legal/reporting duties rather than exchange independence for approval.
1Assess the financial/member consequences.Use transaction terms, relationships, evidence and recoverability; do not claimcriminal fraud without sufficient basis.
1Use the supplied audit classification criteria.Management cannot invent a class in place of the operative Registrar criteria; reasoned overall performance assessment is needed.
1Distinguish challenge from veto.Follow applicable review/appeal process and explain criteria/evidence; committee objection alonedoes noterasefindings or establish a different class.

Non-credit errors

  • Supplied process/criteria exercise not universal State classification law; auditee discussion not mandatory permission to include adverse facts.
Official concept source: Official cooperative-audit concept source references 13.3specialreports/classification/draftdiscussion;suppliedprocess