Group 5: Audit Procedures
30 original test MCQs. 2 marks each. Separate practice and test sets.
Original practice, not ICAI questions, official suggested answers or an official examiner scheme. Equivalent correct work is credited within the stated caps. Public practice availability is not full official question-bank completion.
Not scored yet.
AUD-G05-T001 · 2 marksA file describes reading a revised agreement to identify new risks, then checking approval signatures for operation. Which allocation is correct?
Explanation
Correct answer B: The first is risk assessment; the second is a control test on the stated objectives.
Classify by purpose. Inspection can provide risk understanding or control-operation evidence; its label does not force one category.
AUD-G05-T002 · 2 marksA contract is inspected to understand when a customer becomes entitled to goods. The auditor then says that reading it proves every dispatch was recorded correctly. Which correction is best?
Explanation
Correct answer C: Terms may inform policy application, but transaction recording still needs relevant evidence.
Executed contracts can supply relevant policy information without validating every recorded transaction or assertion.
AUD-G05-T003 · 2 marksStaff process a complaint normally when unobserved but follow extra checks during the audit visit. The auditor has observed only the visit. What should be reported about the evidence?
Explanation
Correct answer C: It concerns observed performance, with possible observer effects and no automatic conclusion on other times.
Observation is useful but limited to its timing and possible behaviour effects. Other-period conclusions require appropriate evidence.
AUD-G05-T004 · 2 marksThe auditor independently runs the full client bank-reconciliation procedure and separately adds its columns. Which pairing is correct?
Explanation
Correct answer C: Independent procedure execution is reperformance; adding columns is recalculation.
Different actions can coexist. Independent execution and mathematical checking are distinct techniques, whatever the document source.
AUD-G05-T005 · 2 marksThe team wants written third-party evidence that contract terms did not change even though the closing balance is zero. Which plan is appropriate at the basic-technique level?
Explanation
Correct answer D: Request a direct written response about terms/modifications, rather than only the balance.
Confirmations can concern terms or absence of conditions. A zero balance does not answer all agreement questions.
AUD-G05-T006 · 2 marksManagement intends to sell a unit but has not followed through on similar plans before and currently lacks authority/resources to act. What is the strongest procedure design?
Explanation
Correct answer B: Evaluate history, reasons and ability, with other relevant evidence, rather than assume intent is conclusive.
History, rationale and ability can corroborate management intent where direct support is limited. They are not guarantees of future action.
AUD-G05-T007 · 2 marksAn inquiry reveals a previously unknown side agreement. Which response best respects its role?
Explanation
Correct answer B: Investigate relevant terms and evidence, and modify/add procedures as needed.
Inquiry can reveal new or inconsistent information and change the work needed. Evaluate actual evidence and reporting implications.
AUD-G05-T008 · 2 marksSource detail will exist for ten days. A monthly summary will remain but lacks information needed for the intended test. Which planning action is sound?
Explanation
Correct answer B: Preserve or examine relevant detail within its availability window, rather than assume the summary substitutes for it.
Retention and timing should address the actual information needed. A surviving summary may not meet the same objective as detailed records.
AUD-G05-T009 · 2 marksPrior evidence establishes unchanged terms, but this year a new population of transactions has been processed. Which conclusion is sound?
Explanation
Correct answer D: Continued terms evidence does not automatically establish the new transactions' quantities, periods or amounts.
Evidence is purpose-specific. Establish continuing relevance and obtain current evidence for objectives not addressed by the old terms.
AUD-G05-T010 · 2 marksFor recorded payable overstatement, the team inspects support for listed amounts. For omitted payables, it uses unmatched receipt information. What explains the different starting points?
Explanation
Correct answer D: Testing direction and the intended objective affect relevance.
Recorded items and information outside the list address different objectives. Investigate actual period/recording rather than infer every item is misstated.
AUD-G05-T011 · 2 marksA supplier statement differs from recorded payables. The auditor traces it to determine whether liabilities were omitted. What is the appropriate boundary?
Explanation
Correct answer A: The difference is relevant information to investigate, not automatically an established omitted amount.
Supplier statements may be relevant for understatement; actual reasons, period and recording treatment must be investigated.
AUD-G05-T012 · 2 marksA document supports an asset's existence, while a separate record is needed for measurement. Which principle applies?
Explanation
Correct answer D: Evidence relevant to one assertion is not a substitute for another assertion's evidence.
The source explains assertion-specific relevance; different sources/natures can contribute to the same or different assertions.
AUD-G05-T013 · 2 marksThe auditor examines an approval mark but does not establish who made it or whether the required review occurred. Which conclusion should be avoided?
Explanation
Correct answer A: That finding a mark alone settles the intended control-operation attributes.
Design control tests around conditions indicating performance/deviation. A visible mark may need context to address the actual required review.
AUD-G05-T014 · 2 marksA review test records no approval deviation, but the transaction amount comparison identifies a difference. What is the best evaluation?
Explanation
Correct answer D: Consider the two objective-specific results separately; a control pass does not erase the amount difference.
Control-operation and substantive conditions are different. Evaluate the actual discrepancy without conflating the objectives.
AUD-G05-T015 · 2 marksA selected-item check detects whether a recorded disclosure detail is misstated. Its working-paper title says control test. What classification should follow the actual design?
Explanation
Correct answer D: Substantive test of details, regardless of the mistaken title.
The objective is detecting material assertion misstatement. Titles do not change the procedure's actual purpose.
AUD-G05-T016 · 2 marksA financial/nonfinancial relationship departs significantly from a prediction, and the team just redraws its chart to match actual figures. What is missing?
Explanation
Correct answer A: Investigation of the inconsistent relationship using relevant information.
Analytical procedures encompass investigation of significant departures/inconsistent relationships, not cosmetic adjustment of predictions.
AUD-G05-T017 · 2 marksThe auditor recalculates a quantity-times-price amount but has not checked the quantity or price source. What can be concluded?
Explanation
Correct answer C: The tested mathematics may be correct while input evidence remains unresolved.
Mathematical accuracy is a distinct objective. Evaluate appropriate input completeness/accuracy or other evidence separately.
AUD-G05-T018 · 2 marksAn assistant copies the client's reconciliation and checks only its grand total, then says she independently executed the reconciliation. What is the correct correction?
Explanation
Correct answer D: Checking a total is recalculation; full relevant independent execution is needed to describe reperformance.
Independent execution is different from accepting the client's output and checking one sum. State the actual scope of work.
AUD-G05-T019 · 2 marksA written question is sent to a knowledgeable warehouse employee, who replies about the process. Does inquiry have to be an oral finance interview?
Explanation
Correct answer B: No; inquiry can be written and involve knowledgeable nonfinancial persons.
Inquiry spans formal written to informal oral responses and financial/nonfinancial persons. Form does not remove the need for evaluation.
AUD-G05-T020 · 2 marksManagement confirms an oral reply in writing, but the team has no relevant corroboration on absence of errors. Which judgement is sound?
Explanation
Correct answer B: Written confirmation of the response does not automatically replace all other evidence for that broad conclusion.
The module contemplates written representations for some responses while retaining the ordinary insufficiency of inquiry alone for absence of material misstatement.
AUD-G05-T021 · 2 marksTwo sources agree about a process, but the auditor has not established actual use or other required evidence. Which approach is sound?
Explanation
Correct answer A: Evaluate what the agreement supports and obtain relevant additional work where needed.
Inquiry evidence can be corroborative but broad operation/absence-of-error claims still require adequate relevant evidence.
AUD-G05-T022 · 2 marksThe team records understanding the entity, then describes further procedures as more understanding only. What should the basic classification include?
Explanation
Correct answer C: Controls tests where required/chosen and substantive detail/analytical procedures.
Further procedures have control and substantive purposes distinct from initial risk understanding; technique choice follows context.
AUD-G05-T023 · 2 marksA reviewer classifies all physical inspection as substantive, irrespective of whether it informs initial risk understanding. What is wrong?
Explanation
Correct answer B: A technique can serve different purposes depending on context; physical format alone is not a category rule.
Inspection and other techniques may be used for different audit purposes in context. Describe the actual objective.
AUD-G05-T024 · 2 marksAn auditor watches staff process an electronic refund and then independently performs the same checking procedure. Which description is most accurate?
Explanation
Correct answer A: Observation occurred first, and reperformance occurred through the separate independent execution.
Watching and independent execution are distinct techniques and may be combined. Evaluate each scope/result rather than force a single label.
AUD-G05-T025 · 2 marksA physically present machine belongs to another entity under an agreement. What is the best immediate interpretation?
Explanation
Correct answer C: Presence supports existence but does not establish this entity's rights or the required reporting treatment.
Rights/obligations and reporting treatment need appropriate evidence. Neither presence nor legal title alone settles all objectives of this procedure case.
AUD-G05-T026 · 2 marksThe auditor discovers required electronic records are no longer retrievable and no backups exist. Which statement is truthful?
Explanation
Correct answer D: The missing evidence is a gap to address with appropriate further work, not a procedure already completed.
Data availability affects planning, but unretrievable evidence cannot be invented. Evaluate remaining appropriate evidence and unresolved scope without predetermined reporting.
AUD-G05-T027 · 2 marksA direct electronic reply from a third party addresses agreement terms but says nothing about transaction quantities. What is the safe conclusion?
Explanation
Correct answer C: It may address the stated terms objective but does not automatically validate all quantities.
Confirmation can be electronic and address non-balance terms. Conclusions remain linked to the response's actual scope.
AUD-G05-T028 · 2 marksManagement's past intentions were consistently carried out, but current resources are uncertain. Which inquiry evaluation is best?
Explanation
Correct answer A: Consider current ability as well as favourable history and reasons, without a future guarantee.
Intent corroboration may use history, rationale and ability. One favourable factor does not settle another or guarantee future conduct.
AUD-G05-T029 · 2 marksThe team tests whether a supervisor detected and corrected material errors through a review. It labels the work substantive because error correction is mentioned. What is the correct focus?
Explanation
Correct answer C: Operating effectiveness of the review is a control-test objective.
Controls are evaluated for preventing or detecting/correcting material assertion misstatements. Distinguish that objective from directly detecting misstatements in recorded amounts.
AUD-G05-T030 · 2 marksA plan includes detailed checks of recorded balances and relationship-based misstatement testing, but calls only the first substantive. What correction is required?
Explanation
Correct answer A: Substantive procedures include tests of details and substantive analytical procedures.
Both categories can have a substantive objective. Analytical procedures can also serve other purposes depending on context, not universally one category.