Group 9: SA 550 / 560 / 570 / 580
30 original practice MCQs. 2 marks each. Separate practice and test sets.
Original practice, not ICAI questions, official suggested answers or an official examiner scheme. Equivalent correct work is credited within the stated caps. Public practice availability is not full official question-bank completion.
Not scored yet.
AUD-G09-P001 · 2 marksA business has new counterparties but gives the auditor only last year's related-party list. What is most appropriate?
Explanation
Correct answer A: Inquire about changes, relationships and transaction types/purposes and corroborate relevant information.
SA55013 requires identity/change, relationship and transaction understanding. Neither an old list nor new status alone determines classification.
AUD-G09-P002 · 2 marksAn approval process exists, but no process identifies related parties for disclosure. What should be understood?
Explanation
Correct answer A: The separate identification/accounting/disclosure control objective and its actual gaps.
Control objectives include identification/accounting/disclosure as well as significant approvals. A gap requires assessed response, not universal fraud.
AUD-G09-P003 · 2 marksBank confirmation mentions a previously unlisted arrangement. Which approach is best?
Explanation
Correct answer C: Remain alert and determine whether supported circumstances confirm a related relationship or transaction.
SA55015/21 require alertness and factual determination. An indicator is neither irrelevant nor a final classification/misstatement.
AUD-G09-P004 · 2 marksAn identified significant related-party transaction is outside ordinary business. Which risk treatment applies?
Explanation
Correct answer D: Treat it as giving rise to a significant risk and perform required responses.
SA55018 specifies the identified significant/outside-normal condition. Approval does not erase it and the condition is not proof of fraud.
AUD-G09-P005 · 2 marksA newly confirmed undisclosed party is found. Management supplies one invoice. What is best?
Explanation
Correct answer A: Request relevant full transaction identification, investigate control failure and perform appropriate further work.
SA55022 requires wider response, team communication and risk reconsideration. A single offered invoice does not establish completeness.
AUD-G09-P006 · 2 marksAn assertion says a related sale was on independent-market-equivalent terms. What is needed?
Explanation
Correct answer B: Sufficient appropriate evidence of the asserted terms, not just the management label.
SA55024 requires evidence for the assertion. Relevant terms/comparability matter; neither label nor universal pricing rule supplies it.
AUD-G09-P007 · 2 marksThe file records party names but no relationship nature. Which requirement is missing?
Explanation
Correct answer C: Documentation of the nature of identified related-party relationships.
SA55028 requires names and relationship nature. A documentation gap does not itself choose an opinion or prove complete identification.
AUD-G09-P008 · 2 marksThe framework has few specific related-party rules. Which statement is correct?
Explanation
Correct answer A: Understand relationships/transactions sufficiently for relevant presentation and risk objectives.
SA5504/9 preserve understanding and presentation/risk objectives. Do not invent universal accounting rules or exemptions.
AUD-G09-P009 · 2 marksThe team's event procedures stop well before report date with no explained later coverage. What is best?
Explanation
Correct answer C: Address the statement-date-to-report-date coverage, or as near as practicable, with appropriate procedures.
SA5606-7 define the coverage and procedures. Gaps need actual evidence, not invented absence or changed labels.
AUD-G09-P010 · 2 marksA governance meeting occurred after year-end but minutes are unavailable. What is required?
Explanation
Correct answer A: Inquire about matters discussed, as part of relevant subsequent-event procedures.
SA5607(c) expressly addresses unavailable minutes. Inquiry/evidence and framework evaluation follow, not automatic treatment or fabricated records.
AUD-G09-P011 · 2 marksA qualifying fact becomes known after report date before issue. What should happen first?
Explanation
Correct answer B: Discuss the matter, determine amendment need and inquire how management intends to address it.
SA56010 requires response to the qualifying known fact. No routine obligation is distinct from this triggered response.
AUD-G09-P012 · 2 marksAmended statements are still unapproved. May the new auditor's report be dated before their approval under the ordinary branch?
Explanation
Correct answer B: No; the new report cannot be dated earlier than amended-statement approval.
SA56011 requires necessary amendment work and a new report no earlier than approval. A promise or original date does not meet it.
AUD-G09-P013 · 2 marksManagement wants restricted amendment and extra report dating, but permission conditions are not checked. Which is best?
Explanation
Correct answer D: Verify the law/framework and approval restrictions before using the limited-procedure branch.
SA56012 is conditional. Both legal/framework amendment and approval conditions matter, and restricted scope must be conveyed.
AUD-G09-P014 · 2 marksAfter issue, management amends statements but plans no recipient notification. What is required?
Explanation
Correct answer D: Review steps ensuring previous recipients of statements/report are informed.
SA56015 includes recipient-information steps, necessary amendment work and reporting. An amendment alone does not demonstrate notification.
AUD-G09-P015 · 2 marksManagement refuses necessary post-issue amendment and recipient-information steps. What follows?
Explanation
Correct answer D: Notify appropriate parties and, if failures persist, take appropriate action seeking to prevent reliance.
SA56017 requires the stated response. Appropriate action depends on circumstances; no universal remedy or fraud finding follows.
AUD-G09-P016 · 2 marksManagement assesses nine months from statement date. No longer period is required by supplied law/framework facts. What is best?
Explanation
Correct answer B: Request extension to at least twelve months from statement date.
SA57013 anchors the minimum to financial-statement date, while longer relevant framework/law periods can apply.
AUD-G09-P017 · 2 marksA forecast uses unsupported customer-growth assumptions. What is appropriate where forecast analysis is significant?
Explanation
Correct answer D: Evaluate underlying data reliability and adequate support for assumptions.
SA57016 distinguishes data/assumption evidence from arithmetic. Representations and formulas do not guarantee forecast feasibility.
AUD-G09-P018 · 2 marksRefinancing is proposed but not committed. Which evaluation is sound?
Explanation
Correct answer B: Assess feasibility and whether the plan is likely to improve the position with relevant evidence.
SA57016 requires plan feasibility/outcome evaluation. Proposal status, timing and supporting evidence matter without universal success/failure.
AUD-G09-P019 · 2 marksAppropriate basis, material uncertainty and adequate disclosure are concluded, with no other opinion issue. What is required?
Explanation
Correct answer C: Unmodified opinion plus a separate Material Uncertainty Related to Going Concern section.
SA57022 specifies this branch. The section highlights uncertainty and does not itself modify the opinion.
AUD-G09-P020 · 2 marksThe auditor concludes going-concern basis was inappropriately used. Which SA570 outcome applies?
Explanation
Correct answer B: Adverse opinion.
SA57021 explicitly requires adverse for inappropriate basis. This differs from appropriate-basis uncertainty and evidence-inability situations.
AUD-G09-P021 · 2 marksBasis is appropriate but material uncertainty disclosure is inadequate. Which branch applies?
Explanation
Correct answer D: Qualified or adverse as appropriate, with the required explanation of uncertainty and inadequate disclosure.
SA57023 distinguishes disclosure inadequacy from the adequate-disclosure branch. Exact type depends on appropriate assessed circumstances.
AUD-G09-P022 · 2 marksEvents cast doubt but evidence supports no material uncertainty. Does that end disclosure evaluation?
Explanation
Correct answer B: No; assess adequate event/condition disclosures under the applicable framework.
SA57020 still requires relevant disclosure evaluation. No uncertainty is neither blanket removal nor automatic modification.
AUD-G09-P023 · 2 marksAn audit report has no material-uncertainty reference. Which claim is correct?
Explanation
Correct answer C: It is not a guarantee that the entity will continue operating.
SA5707 states the guarantee limit. Future uncertainty and inherent limitations remain; management and auditor responsibilities differ.
AUD-G09-P024 · 2 marksA department head without statement responsibility signs the only representation letter. What is best?
Explanation
Correct answer A: Request representations from management with appropriate responsibilities and knowledge.
SA5808 specifies the responsible/knowledgeable source. Signatures or supporting records do not automatically satisfy the requirement.
AUD-G09-P025 · 2 marksA letter is dated after the proposed auditor's report. What is the rule?
Explanation
Correct answer A: Representations are near as practicable to, but not after, report date; necessary representations must be obtained before the report is dated, with dates on or before report date.
SA58013/A15 govern timing. Necessary evidence cannot be fabricated as present before it existed.
AUD-G09-P026 · 2 marksNew responsible management was appointed after the comparative period. What coverage remains required?
Explanation
Correct answer D: All statements/periods referred to in the report, notwithstanding appointment timing.
SA580A18 preserves current management responsibility and required whole-period coverage.
AUD-G09-P027 · 2 marksA specific representation conflicts with supported evidence. No final integrity assessment is supplied. What is best?
Explanation
Correct answer C: Attempt resolution and evaluate unresolved reliability/integrity effects without automatically invoking every disclaimer condition.
SA58016-19 require investigation and exact conditions. A specific conflict is not automatically sufficient core-integrity doubt.
AUD-G09-P028 · 2 marksManagement refuses required preparation and information/transaction-completeness representations. Which outcome is specified?
Explanation
Correct answer B: Disclaimer under SA705 pursuant to SA58019.
Non-provision of required9-10 representations meets the precise SA58019 condition, not merely a generic unspecified report issue.
AUD-G09-P029 · 2 marksCore letters are signed, but sufficient integrity doubt makes them unreliable after investigation. What is specified?
Explanation
Correct answer C: Disclaimer under SA705 pursuant to SA58019.
SA58019(a) applies to core unreliability due to sufficient integrity doubt, despite receipt of signatures.
AUD-G09-P030 · 2 marksA legally required public statement is determined to cover preparation responsibility only. What remains needed?
Explanation
Correct answer A: Other uncovered required representations, including paragraph10 matters.
SA58014/A19 permit a scoped substitute for covered matters, not blanket coverage or universal invalidation.
Official standards: SA550, SA560, SA570, SA580.