Strategic Analysis: Internal Environment

Original descriptive practice: 30 original cases, 4 at 3 marks, 20 at 5 and 6 at 10. Internal environment/stakeholders/Mendelow; strategic drivers/group maps/marketing/channels; resources/core competence; SWOT; sustainability/generic strategies/best-cost. Original preparation, not official questions, marking schemes or complete official bank. Native tables scroll on phones.

Boundaries: Group-map circle area explicitly encodes sales share, not reputation. Stakeholder positions change and never remove duties or confidentiality. Core tests, VRIN and sustainability factors differ. Focus growth-label conflicts, force-immunity claims and current brand promises are held; no strategy guarantees success.

SM-C03-D001 · 3 marks

A firm lists only its machines as internal environment, ignoring people, authority and culture. Identify other elements and their strategic relevance. (3 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditWorking / case application
1People/processSkills and input-throughput-output routines shape what the firm can deliver.
1StructureAuthority, responsibility and accountability affect decisions/execution.
1CultureValues, ethics and relationships shape identity and adaptation; machinery alone does not establish capability.

Original indicative capped marking, not official ICAI scheme. Two-mark rows require concept and developed case reasoning/application. Equivalent justified work accepted without duplication. Explicit case assumptions and source conflicts govern classification; no guaranteed outcomes.

Official concept source, PDF page 2

SM-C03-D002 · 5 marks

A board sees the firm as shareholders only. Employees, a lender, customers and suppliers affect its service plan. Explain the stakeholder view and conflicts. (5 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditWorking / case application
1ScopeInternal/external parties with interest or impact can be stakeholders.
1OwnersShareholders matter but are not the entire coalition.
1EmployeesEmployment/skills/working conditions may affect execution.
1OthersLender terms, customer service and supply continuity may matter differently.
1ConflictMap actual expectations/influence rather than assume every owner wants quick profits or every group agrees.

Original indicative capped marking, not official ICAI scheme. Two-mark rows require concept and developed case reasoning/application. Equivalent justified work accepted without duplication. Explicit case assumptions and source conflicts govern classification; no guaranteed outcomes.

Official concept source, PDF page 3

SM-C03-D003 · 3 marks

An investor can block funding but is not interested in daily work. A technician cares deeply but lacks decision authority. Define axes and distinguish their positions. (3 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditWorking / case application
1PowerAbility to influence resources/strategy differs from enthusiasm.
1InterestDegree of involvement in the case outcome is a separate axis.
1ApplyInvestor high-power/low-interest: keep satisfied; technician low-power/high-interest: keep informed. Assumptions depend on actual influence, not identity alone.

Original indicative capped marking, not official ICAI scheme. Two-mark rows require concept and developed case reasoning/application. Equivalent justified work accepted without duplication. Explicit case assumptions and source conflicts govern classification; no guaranteed outcomes.

Official concept source, PDF page 5

SM-C03-D004 · 5 marks

Given case groups: board high/high, lender high/low, staff low/high, newsletter low/low. Apply Mendelow and communication limits. (5 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditWorking / case application
1BoardManage closely/key players; involve appropriately in decisions.
1LenderKeep satisfied with relevant information/consultation.
1StaffKeep informed and use interested feedback.
1NewsletterMonitor with proportionate effort under supplied low/low assumptions.
1LimitsQuadrants can change; do not ignore rights, duties or disclose all private information because interest is high.

Original indicative capped marking, not official ICAI scheme. Two-mark rows require concept and developed case reasoning/application. Equivalent justified work accepted without duplication. Explicit case assumptions and source conflicts govern classification; no guaranteed outcomes.

Official concept source, PDF page 6

SM-C03-D005 · 10 marks

A regulator stipulated initially high-power/low-interest opens an investigation and becomes high-interest. Staff initially low-power/high-interest gain collective leverage. The CEO is high/high; a small uninvolved newsletter low/low. Apply matrix, changes and a justified engagement plan. (10 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditWorking / case application
2RegulatorMoves from keep satisfied to manage closely when interest rises. Review relevant verified information and requirements; the matrix does not settle actual law or require disclosing unrelated confidential data.
2StaffHigh interest with increased power can make staff key players. Involve them in relevant decisions, using the new influence evidence rather than treating employees permanently powerless.
2CEOHigh/high merits close engagement and clear decisions/resources. Frequent updates should match actual needs, not automatic daily noise or unlimited authority.
2NewsletterLow/low means proportionate monitoring, not neglecting binding duties or deception. Reassess if reach, interest or issue relevance changes.
2PlanPower and interest are distinct dynamic axes; define purpose/owner/timing of relevant engagement and revisit after events. No actual message or disclosure is authorised by this fictional plan.

Original indicative capped marking, not official ICAI scheme. Two-mark rows require concept and developed case reasoning/application. Equivalent justified work accepted without duplication. Explicit case assumptions and source conflicts govern classification; no guaranteed outcomes.

Official concept source, PDF page 7

SM-C03-D006 · 3 marks

A firm measures only profit and ignores markets, customers, products and channels. Identify drivers and explain how they connect. (3 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditWorking / case application
1Market/customerAssess industry/relative market position and different customer needs.
1Product/channelExamine offering performance and how sales/physical/service channels reach people.
1ConnectionProduct-market and customer-channel choices interact; management metrics can be purpose or profit led but should fit the business.

Original indicative capped marking, not official ICAI scheme. Two-mark rows require concept and developed case reasoning/application. Equivalent justified work accepted without duplication. Explicit case assumptions and source conflicts govern classification; no guaranteed outcomes.

Official concept source, PDF page 8

SM-C03-D007 · 5 marks

A company groups all its food, cosmetics and repair customers into one identical market. Distinguish industry/market and implications. (5 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditWorking / case application
1IndustryGrouping uses comparable primary products/services and competitors.
1MarketBuyers/sellers of defined offerings in an area can be physical/virtual/local/global.
1ProductsDifferent product lines can serve different customer markets.
1StrategyAssess each line's needs/position rather than infer uniform demand.
1BoundaryExplicit product/geography/role definitions matter; labels alone do not supply competitor shares.

Original indicative capped marking, not official ICAI scheme. Two-mark rows require concept and developed case reasoning/application. Equivalent justified work accepted without duplication. Explicit case assumptions and source conflicts govern classification; no guaranteed outcomes.

Official concept source, PDF page 9

SM-C03-D008 · 5 marks

Four firms differ in price/quality, product breadth and channels. Describe mapping steps and what similar map positions mean. (5 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditWorking / case application
1VariablesSelect competitive characteristics that differentiate approaches.
1PlotPlace firms on explicit two-variable axes using evidence.
1GroupSimilar strategy space can indicate a strategic group, not identical performance.
1CircleUse group industry-sales share as the stated size encoding.
1LimitChoose meaningful nonredundant axes and state encodings; PDF page 11 confuses reputation/size versus page 10 sales-share instruction.

Original indicative capped marking, not official ICAI scheme. Two-mark rows require concept and developed case reasoning/application. Equivalent justified work accepted without duplication. Explicit case assumptions and source conflicts govern classification; no guaranteed outcomes.

Official concept source, PDF page 10

SM-C03-D009 · 5 marks

One industry has premium narrow-range firms and low-price broad-range firms. Explain groups and limits of group count. (5 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditWorking / case application
1SimilarPremium narrow firms may share approaches/position.
1DifferentLow-price broad firms may occupy another group.
1One/manyIdentical approaches can yield one group; fully distinct approaches potentially one per rival.
1EvidenceAssess channels, service, technology/customer targets as well as labels.
1LimitGroup mapping does not prove members have equal profits or all rivals fit forever; positions change.

Original indicative capped marking, not official ICAI scheme. Two-mark rows require concept and developed case reasoning/application. Equivalent justified work accepted without duplication. Explicit case assumptions and source conflicts govern classification; no guaranteed outcomes.

Official concept source, PDF page 9

SM-C03-D010 · 10 marks

Firms A/B/C/D have supplied industry sales 40/30/20/10 percent. A/B share low-price/broad offerings; C/D high-price/narrow. Map groups with circle area proportional to group sales share, not radius. Explain axes, totals, relative radii and source wording conflict. (10 marks)

Supplied industry sales shares; circle AREA, not radius, encodes grouped share.

FirmShare percentApproach
A40Low price/broad
B30Low price/broad
C20High price/narrow
D10High price/narrow
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditWorking / case application
2Axes/groupsUse price and breadth as defined axes; A/B form low-price/broad group and C/D high-price/narrow. Position represents competitive approach, not automatically superior quality or profitability.
2SharesGroup 1 share 70%, group 2 share 30%; total 100%. Firm shares must be combined for the group, not individually mistaken for group coverage.
2AreaArea ratio is 70/30=7/3. With area=pi*r², radius ratio=sqrt(7/3)=1.527525. Making radii proportional to 70:30 would distort the encoded area.
2Source conflictPage 10 says circle size proportional to sales revenue share but page 11 describes size as reputation. This case explicitly encodes share by area; any reputation axis must be separate and labelled.
2InterpretationA larger circle means larger supplied group share, not necessarily reputation, quality or profits. Review data/axes and changing competitors before drawing strategic conclusions.

Original indicative capped marking, not official ICAI scheme. Two-mark rows require concept and developed case reasoning/application. Equivalent justified work accepted without duplication. Explicit case assumptions and source conflicts govern classification; no guaranteed outcomes.

Official concept source, PDF page 10

SM-C03-D011 · 5 marks

A parent buys a child's school bag. Compare pricing/customer and design/user considerations without treating them as completely separate. (5 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditWorking / case application
1RolesParent is purchasing customer; child uses the product.
1PriceUnderstand parent willingness/ability to pay.
1UseComfort/durability meet child's user needs.
1LinkPoor user satisfaction may affect repeat purchase by parent.
1LimitRoles can coincide or influence both price/design; the chapter's emphasis is not a rigid rule.

Original indicative capped marking, not official ICAI scheme. Two-mark rows require concept and developed case reasoning/application. Equivalent justified work accepted without duplication. Explicit case assumptions and source conflicts govern classification; no guaranteed outcomes.

Official concept source, PDF page 12

SM-C03-D012 · 5 marks

A firm keeps all old products, adds new ones blindly and ignores warranty/service. Explain product strategic-driver choices. (5 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditWorking / case application
1PortfolioAssess performance, add suitable offerings and review failing ones.
1FeaturesBranding, packaging, warranties and service affect customer value.
1DynamicsProduct-market needs/life spans change.
1PricingBalance customer-centric fit, reasonable margin and share aims.
1LimitPerceived differentiation can matter but cannot justify misleading claims or automatic deletion without evidence.

Original indicative capped marking, not official ICAI scheme. Two-mark rows require concept and developed case reasoning/application. Equivalent justified work accepted without duplication. Explicit case assumptions and source conflicts govern classification; no guaranteed outcomes.

Official concept source, PDF page 13

SM-C03-D013 · 3 marks

Campaigns promote recycling practice, supply extra installation help and maintain loyalty benefits. Identify social, augmented and relationship marketing. (3 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditWorking / case application
1SocialPractice-change campaign seeks acceptance of a social idea/cause.
1AugmentedInstallation help adds benefits beyond core/actual offering.
1RelationshipLoyalty benefits aim to maintain strong customer/stakeholder bonds; no guarantee retention.

Original indicative capped marking, not official ICAI scheme. Two-mark rows require concept and developed case reasoning/application. Equivalent justified work accepted without duplication. Explicit case assumptions and source conflicts govern classification; no guaranteed outcomes.

Official concept source, PDF page 14

SM-C03-D014 · 5 marks

A firm runs response catalogues, promotes repair services, a performer's reputation and a town as destination. Classify and separate organisation marketing. (5 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditWorking / case application
1DirectCatalogue asks direct consumer response.
1ServiceIntangible repair offerings require appropriate service marketing.
1PersonPerformer campaign changes attitudes toward an individual.
1PlaceDestination campaign changes attitudes toward a location.
1OrganisationCampaign about the firm as an entity is organisation marketing, distinct though activities can overlap.

Original indicative capped marking, not official ICAI scheme. Two-mark rows require concept and developed case reasoning/application. Equivalent justified work accepted without duplication. Explicit case assumptions and source conflicts govern classification; no guaranteed outcomes.

Official concept source, PDF page 15

SM-C03-D015 · 10 marks

A cinema has empty weekdays and crowded evenings. A brand offers different products to several segments, another specialises in one niche, and a park must reduce excessive entry demand. Compare synchro/differential/concentrated/demarketing with enlightened principles. (10 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditWorking / case application
2SynchroWeekday pricing/promotion may shift timing to balance irregular demand and capacity. Evaluate feasible incentives instead of assuming demand immediately moves.
2DifferentialSeparate offers for several segments indicate differentiated market coverage. Segment needs/costs should support the offer differences, not merely new brand labels.
2ConcentratedA niche specialist pursues a large share of one/few submarkets. This differs from automatically offering many products across the whole market.
2DemarketingPark overfull demand may need reduction/shift, not destruction of demand. Match actions to capacity, duties and visitor needs; no actual pricing/access change is authorised.
2EnlightenedCustomer orientation, innovation, value, sense of mission and societal consideration guide long-run system performance. These are a philosophy, not another demand-timing label or guaranteed result.

Original indicative capped marking, not official ICAI scheme. Two-mark rows require concept and developed case reasoning/application. Equivalent justified work accepted without duplication. Explicit case assumptions and source conflicts govern classification; no guaranteed outcomes.

Official concept source, PDF page 15

SM-C03-D016 · 5 marks

A dealer sells a machine, a carrier delivers it and a specialist installs/maintains it. Classify three channels and analyse their alignment. (5 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditWorking / case application
1SalesDealer is selling intermediary toward end user.
1ProductCarrier physically handles/moves product.
1ServiceInstaller/maintenance provider supplies supporting services.
1FitCoordinate timing/capacity and customer requirements across channels.
1LimitWider channels are not automatically better; assess cost/service needs instead of stereotypes that all older users lack digital access.

Original indicative capped marking, not official ICAI scheme. Two-mark rows require concept and developed case reasoning/application. Equivalent justified work accepted without duplication. Explicit case assumptions and source conflicts govern classification; no guaranteed outcomes.

Official concept source, PDF page 16

SM-C03-D017 · 5 marks

A factory owns robots but lacks coordinated skills/process knowledge. Explain resources, capability and core competence. (5 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditWorking / case application
1ResourcesRobots/people/technology are inputs, not automatically competence.
1CapabilityCoordinating deployment into effective routines matters.
1CombinationCompetency combines skills/techniques rather than a single isolated tool.
1CoreCollective learning integrates production/technology/managerial know-how.
1LimitTest customer value, rival differentiation and market application; possession or a fixed count of expertise areas alone proves nothing.

Original indicative capped marking, not official ICAI scheme. Two-mark rows require concept and developed case reasoning/application. Equivalent justified work accepted without duplication. Explicit case assumptions and source conflicts govern classification; no guaranteed outcomes.

Official concept source, PDF page 18

SM-C03-D018 · 5 marks

A delivery system is hard to imitate, improves customer reliability and can be used across several service markets. Apply three core-competency tests. (5 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditWorking / case application
1DifferentiationRival difficulty matching the integrated system can distinguish the firm.
1ValueReliability must deliver a fundamental benefit customers value.
1MarketsTransfer/application can open several markets rather than remain one narrow trick.
1IntegrationShow how people/routines/technology combine, not merely name a department.
1LimitClaims require evidence and continued improvement; hard imitation is not no fear of copying forever.

Original indicative capped marking, not official ICAI scheme. Two-mark rows require concept and developed case reasoning/application. Equivalent justified work accepted without duplication. Explicit case assumptions and source conflicts govern classification; no guaranteed outcomes.

Official concept source, PDF page 19

SM-C03-D019 · 5 marks

A scheduling capability is valuable and rare but rivals can cheaply buy an equivalent. Assess all four building criteria. (5 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditWorking / case application
1ValuableHelps exploit opportunity/avoid threats and create customer value.
1RareFew rivals possess it under supplied facts.
1ImitationCheap access undermines costly-to-imitate condition.
1SubstitutionA strategically equivalent available system undermines non-substitutability.
1ConclusionTwo favourable labels do not establish sustainable core advantage; assess actual equivalent use and update capability.

Original indicative capped marking, not official ICAI scheme. Two-mark rows require concept and developed case reasoning/application. Equivalent justified work accepted without duplication. Explicit case assumptions and source conflicts govern classification; no guaranteed outcomes.

Official concept source, PDF page 20

SM-C03-D020 · 10 marks

Cedar Medical Logistics combines cold-chain routines, training and tracking. Patients value reliability; few rivals can match its integrated processes, substitutes are not equivalent, and methods can transfer to other markets. Patent alone is offered as proof of permanent leadership. Assess core tests, VRIN and maintenance. (10 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditWorking / case application
2IntegrationRoutines/training/tracking combine technological, human and managerial resources. A patent or asset alone is not the full competence.
2Three testsCustomer reliability value, rival differentiation and market transfer support core-competence assessment if the supplied claims hold. Demonstrate the benefit/use, not just slogans.
2VRINValuable, rare, costly-to-imitate and non-substitutable are a distinct four-criterion test. Check rivals' actual alternatives and changing technology, rather than assume each follows from a patent.
2MaintenanceLearning/teamwork/culture and continuing investment can sustain capability; transfer may share learning but does not guarantee risk/investment always fall.
2LimitPermanent leadership is unsupported. Evidence of performance, renewal and value is required; source current brand/patent examples are not verified market/legal facts.

Original indicative capped marking, not official ICAI scheme. Two-mark rows require concept and developed case reasoning/application. Equivalent justified work accepted without duplication. Explicit case assumptions and source conflicts govern classification; no guaranteed outcomes.

Official concept source, PDF page 20

SM-C03-D021 · 5 marks

A firm has trained technicians, weak dispatch, new repair demand and an entering rival. Classify SWOT and connect an action. (5 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditWorking / case application
1StrengthTrained technicians are internal helpful capability.
1WeaknessDispatch weakness is internal harmful condition.
1OpportunityNew external repair demand may help if accessible.
1ThreatExternal rival entry can pressure the position.
1UseTest demand/relative skill advantage and improve dispatch to use the opportunity; a list alone does not choose a strategy.

Original indicative capped marking, not official ICAI scheme. Two-mark rows require concept and developed case reasoning/application. Equivalent justified work accepted without duplication. Explicit case assumptions and source conflicts govern classification; no guaranteed outcomes.

Official concept source, PDF page 22

SM-C03-D022 · 5 marks

A manager lists strengths without rival benchmarks and calls every external change an opportunity. Evaluate. (5 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditWorking / case application
1RelativeStrengths need competitive relevance, not only self-praise.
1ExternalA change can be opportunity or threat depending effect/fit.
1EvidenceVerify helpful/harmful implications and internal/external origin.
1ChoiceCombine factors with feasible alternatives and priorities.
1LimitSWOT simplifies issues but lacks inherent competitive evaluation/ranking; not every routine action needs a full formal exercise.

Original indicative capped marking, not official ICAI scheme. Two-mark rows require concept and developed case reasoning/application. Equivalent justified work accepted without duplication. Explicit case assumptions and source conflicts govern classification; no guaranteed outcomes.

Official concept source, PDF page 23

SM-C03-D023 · 5 marks

A capability depends on a departing expert, can be bought by rivals, is easily rebuilt and returns go to an outside rights-holder. Apply four sustainability factors. (5 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditWorking / case application
1DurabilityExpert departure may erode the capability over time.
1TransferabilityRivals can buy/access it, reducing persistence.
1ImitabilityEasy rebuilding from scratch weakens defence.
1AppropriabilityWho captures returns matters even if customers value it.
1LimitThese four differ from VRIN and core tests; assess actual control/contracts without inferring legal ownership.

Original indicative capped marking, not official ICAI scheme. Two-mark rows require concept and developed case reasoning/application. Equivalent justified work accepted without duplication. Explicit case assumptions and source conflicts govern classification; no guaranteed outcomes.

Official concept source, PDF page 24

SM-C03-D024 · 5 marks

A firm targets broad price-sensitive buyers with efficient standard offerings; another broad buyers with valued uniqueness; two specialists serve a narrow segment by cost and uniqueness. Classify four grid cells. (5 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditWorking / case application
1Broad costBroad scope/low-cost basis is cost leadership.
1Broad uniqueBroad scope/differentiation basis is differentiation.
1Narrow costFocused cost serves narrow needs efficiently, not necessarily lowest price industry-wide.
1Narrow uniqueFocused differentiation offers valued uniqueness to a niche.
1AxesScope and advantage are separate; size or price label alone does not prove a strategy.

Original indicative capped marking, not official ICAI scheme. Two-mark rows require concept and developed case reasoning/application. Equivalent justified work accepted without duplication. Explicit case assumptions and source conflicts govern classification; no guaranteed outcomes.

Official concept source, PDF page 26

SM-C03-D025 · 10 marks

Maple manufactures standard products for broad price-sensitive demand. It has efficient scale, low overhead and waste-control routines. Buyer preferences shift to service and rivals adopt a new process. Advise cost strategy, drivers, force effects and risks. (10 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditWorking / case application
2FitBroad price-sensitive/standard-product conditions support cost leadership if Maple actually achieves lower costs. A low price alone with high cost is not leadership.
2DriversForecast demand, use capacity efficiently, standardise, coordinate procurement/distribution and assess cost-saving technology. Scale/learning/linkages can help but diseconomies and R&D/energy costs also matter.
2OrganisationCost discipline, appropriate incentives and employee participation align the strategy. Avoid blindly cutting research or quality that customers need; share resources only when gains exceed coordination costs.
2ForcesA cost cushion may help absorb supplier increases or compete on price, but buyers/substitutes/rivalry still exert pressure. It does not authorise predatory/collusive actions or guarantee customers remain.
2RisksImitation/new processes and shifting service preferences can defeat the old advantage. Review customer value and renew capabilities; success/volume/margin are not guaranteed by the label.

Original indicative capped marking, not official ICAI scheme. Two-mark rows require concept and developed case reasoning/application. Equivalent justified work accepted without duplication. Explicit case assumptions and source conflicts govern classification; no guaranteed outcomes.

Official concept source, PDF page 27

SM-C03-D026 · 5 marks

A firm adds a costly feature buyers do not value and claims uniqueness guarantees profit. Explain fit, sources and risks. (5 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditWorking / case application
1ValueStudy needs/preferences; uniqueness without customer value is insufficient.
1BasisDesign, service, technology, brand/network or organisational advantages may differentiate.
1EconomicsPremium must cover relevant extra cost; high price alone does not prove superiority.
1RiskRapid copying/alternatives can erode loyalty and benefit.
1LimitBuyers still negotiate, suppliers raise costs and substitutes compete; source immunity claims need qualification.

Original indicative capped marking, not official ICAI scheme. Two-mark rows require concept and developed case reasoning/application. Equivalent justified work accepted without duplication. Explicit case assumptions and source conflicts govern classification; no guaranteed outcomes.

Official concept source, PDF page 29

SM-C03-D027 · 5 marks

A repair specialist serves a narrow group needing unusual equipment. Discuss focus fit and two variants. (5 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditWorking / case application
1ScopeWell-defined narrow customers/geography/product needs.
1FitSufficient segment demand/growth and distinctive skills matter.
1CostFocused cost offers low relative price/cost within the target, not necessarily all-industry cheapest.
1UniqueFocused differentiation supplies valued special features.
1RiskNiche may shrink, tastes converge or rivals imitate; focused cost does not automatically charge premium prices.

Original indicative capped marking, not official ICAI scheme. Two-mark rows require concept and developed case reasoning/application. Equivalent justified work accepted without duplication. Explicit case assumptions and source conflicts govern classification; no guaranteed outcomes.

Official concept source, PDF page 32

SM-C03-D028 · 5 marks

Oak offers comparable premium features at 110 versus rivals 130, while efficiently creating the product at 80. Explain best-cost intent and comparison limits. (5 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditWorking / case application
1IntentMore value for money combines efficient cost and useful differences.
1ComparableLower price for comparable features supports the proposed position.
1AlternativeSimilar price with significantly better features can also fit.
1EconomicsCase unit margin 30 before other costs; assess cost/quality feasibility.
1LimitIt is not cheap price alone, luxury at any cost or guaranteed advantage; rivals' comparable offers matter.

Original indicative capped marking, not official ICAI scheme. Two-mark rows require concept and developed case reasoning/application. Equivalent justified work accepted without duplication. Explicit case assumptions and source conflicts govern classification; no guaranteed outcomes.

Official concept source, PDF page 34

SM-C03-D029 · 5 marks

Two units share procurement/platform costs and transfer know-how. Manager assumes every merger automatically creates synergy. Assess. (5 marks)
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditWorking / case application
1SharingShared activities may reduce cost or enhance differentiation.
1TransferKnow-how across autonomous units can improve capabilities.
1FitIdentify actual complementary activities/customer benefits.
1Cost-benefitCoordination, integration and lost flexibility can offset gains.
1LimitNo automatic synergy/approval to merge; evaluate evidence and fit rather than use a label.

Original indicative capped marking, not official ICAI scheme. Two-mark rows require concept and developed case reasoning/application. Equivalent justified work accepted without duplication. Explicit case assumptions and source conflicts govern classification; no guaranteed outcomes.

Official concept source, PDF page 26

SM-C03-D030 · 10 marks

Cedar serves a narrow medical-delivery segment with valued reliable cold-chain service. Routines combine training/tracking and are hard to copy, but key expertise could leave. Board high/high, lender high/low, staff low/high and newsletter low/low are stipulated. A new rival enters and wider demand rises; dispatch capacity is weak. The firm sells through agencies, physically delivers itself and supports users through specialists. Analyse stakeholders, drivers/channels, capability/sustainability, SWOT and competitive strategy. (10 marks)

Stipulated stakeholder axes, not conclusions about real people.

GroupPowerInterest
BoardHighHigh
LenderHighLow
StaffLowHigh
NewsletterLowLow
Show answer and marking
MarksCreditWorking / case application
2StakeholdersManage board closely, keep lender satisfied, staff informed, newsletter monitored under the supplied axes. Reassess changes and retain rights/confidentiality boundaries; labels are not permanent identity rankings.
2Drivers/channelsDefine medical segment/customer/user needs and current product performance. Agencies sell, own delivery moves products and specialists support service; coordinate capacity and handoffs rather than simply multiply channels.
2CapabilityIntegrated training/tracking routines may meet value/differentiation/market-transfer and VRIN tests only with evidence. Expert departure affects durability; access/rebuilding and return capture affect the other sustainability factors.
2SWOTReliable routines strength, dispatch weakness, wider demand opportunity and rival threat. Benchmark significance and improve capacity before assuming a growth choice; a simple list is not complete competitive evaluation.
2StrategyNarrow segment plus valued reliable uniqueness supports focused differentiation. Price/cost/imitability/niche demand and substitutes matter; premium/leadership/profit not guaranteed, and source growth labels/patent/current promises remain held.

Original indicative capped marking, not official ICAI scheme. Two-mark rows require concept and developed case reasoning/application. Equivalent justified work accepted without duplication. Explicit case assumptions and source conflicts govern classification; no guaranteed outcomes.

Official concept source, PDF page 32